> Not in our experience...we have not had great success migrating from FSK 100 > series to ePMP. Noise floor SNR sucks.
Have you tried migrating from 2.4 FSK too 2.4 450 at a very noisy site? Have a site I need more capacity at and frequency options are limited. >> Hey guys, >> >> We're on a tower with a basically dead WISP that has 3 sectors of 2.4ghz up >> there. It's 10 year old equipment so not even sure what brand. Anyway, we >> placed 4 sectors of Ubiquiti 2.4 gear on 10 MHz channels with RF Armor on >> all sectors. We found that channels 1 and 11 were best so we did channel 1 >> on North and south sector and channel 11 on east and west so they're back to >> back. The back to back sectors are separated by a solid water tank/tower but >> they still see each other at -55 which is hotter than I thought they would >> be with Armor and the water tank. >> >> Anyway, we don't get the best of performance due to self interference as >> well as interference from the old WISP equipment. In your experience with >> ePMP, would we see a noticeable improvement going to ePMP 2.4 gear and >> syncing it all for channel reuse on the back to back sectors? Would this >> also give us the added benefit that we would reduce adjacent channel >> interference with ourselves because all sectors would transmit and receive >> with each other? >> >> Thank you
