Not really pleased with Ubnt sectors.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > Why? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:36:27 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? > > I wouldn't. You're welcome to, though. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Aug 11, 2015 12:34 PM, "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> A followup question before ordering... >> >> The UBNT Titanium AM-M-V5G-Ti antenna fits my dimensional requirements >> and has similar specifications to the RF Elements Carrier Class 5 GHz 17 >> dBi antenna. >> >> Although it is more expensive, should I consider trying the Titanium >> before the RF Elements unit? >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band antennas >>> and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Chuck >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 2.4ghz or 5ghz? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Cambium OEM is RF elements. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being >>>>>> slightly "better". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> >>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From: *"Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM >>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? >>>>>> >>>>>> I think those are the ePMP sectors? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Chuck >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 >>>>>>> GHz 14dBi sectors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small >>>>>>> sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low >>>>>>> cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new >>>>>>> versions perform significantly better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Chris >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
