I haven't tried the Ti or AC, but the originals are not great...

But you can get a spiffy adapter from rf elements to snap an ePMP right in.
On Aug 11, 2015 11:49 AM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The original and Ti.  I haven't tried the AC nor anything else they may
> have (IIRC they have 3 generations of sectors?)
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> They have several different ones. Which ones aren't you pleased with?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:46:28 AM
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP?
>>
>> Not really pleased with Ubnt sectors.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:36:27 AM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't.  You're welcome to, though.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Aug 11, 2015 12:34 PM, "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A followup question before ordering...
>>>>
>>>> The UBNT Titanium AM-M-V5G-Ti antenna fits my dimensional requirements
>>>> and has similar specifications to the RF Elements Carrier Class 5 GHz 17
>>>> dBi antenna.
>>>>
>>>> Although it is more expensive, should I consider trying the Titanium
>>>> before the RF Elements unit?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band
>>>>> antennas and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned...
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2.4ghz or 5ghz?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Cambium OEM is RF elements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being
>>>>>>>> slightly "better".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> *From: *"Chuck Hogg" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM
>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with
>>>>>>>> ePMP?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think those are the ePMP sectors?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4
>>>>>>>>> GHz 14dBi sectors.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small
>>>>>>>>> sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and 
>>>>>>>>> low
>>>>>>>>> cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new
>>>>>>>>> versions perform significantly better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Chris
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to