They have several different ones. Which ones aren't you pleased with?
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:46:28 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? Not really pleased with Ubnt sectors. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: Why? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com From: "Josh Luthman" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:36:27 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? I wouldn't. You're welcome to, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 11, 2015 12:34 PM, "Christopher Gray" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> A followup question before ordering... The UBNT Titanium AM-M-V5G-Ti antenna fits my dimensional requirements and has similar specifications to the RF Elements Carrier Class 5 GHz 17 dBi antenna. Although it is more expensive, should I consider trying the Titanium before the RF Elements unit? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Chuck Hogg < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Whatever you do, don't go the ITElite route with the dual band antennas and the horrible F/B as Mathew Howard mentioned... Regards, Chuck On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mathew Howard < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> 2.4ghz or 5ghz? On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Jerry Head < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> My Cambium ePMP sectors say "Mars Antenna" on them. On 8/10/2015 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: <blockquote> The Cambium OEM is RF elements. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I think it's the same rough design with the RF Elements ones being slightly "better". ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com From: "Chuck Hogg" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:19:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF Elements "Carrier Class Sector" with ePMP? I think those are the ePMP sectors? Regards, Chuck On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Christopher Gray < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'm considering the RF Elements "Carrier Class" 5GHz 17dBi and 2.4 GHz 14dBi sectors. Any positive experience with these? I need some relatively small sectors (in the <2' height range). I like the visual simplicity and low cost of the older RF Elements "MiMo Sectors" but I wonder if their new versions perform significantly better. -Chris </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
