Sean, I think you're correct. Adding an additional AP will be tough in this particular situation. Just trying to squeeze as much as we can our of this AP.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > If it was me, I'd just deploy another AP instead of trying to tweak the > frame for just a little bit more speed. you'll end up back at 100% capacity > in no time with the frame tweaks. with adding an AP that should solve the > problem for at least a year. > > 2 cents > > -Sean > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I had the same question. I'm considering changing an AP from 2.5ms to >> 5ms. I'm aware of the doubled latency, but I'm more interested in the >> additional 7mb/s downlink (according to 450 capacity planner). >> >> We have an AP with ~50 subs and it reaches 100% downlink every >> evening. I'm considering changing downlink from 75% to 85% and moving >> to 5ms frames. By doing so, we should increase capacity by 9 to 11mb/s >> on the downlink. >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com> wrote: >> > Hey folks. >> > >> > Has anyone experimented with 5ms frame on pmp450 or the 450i? Last >> > couple of >> > times I tried it, it seemed like overall throughput on the AP was >> > slightly >> > worse than on 2.5ms, even though radio to radio link tests were higher. >> > >> > >> > peace >> > >> > Vlad > >
