is adding an AP physically tough (tower space, winter time etc.) or logically tough (not enough spectrum)?
just curious On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Eric Muehleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > Sean, I think you're correct. Adding an additional AP will be tough in > this particular situation. Just trying to squeeze as much as we can > our of this AP. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > > If it was me, I'd just deploy another AP instead of trying to tweak the > > frame for just a little bit more speed. you'll end up back at 100% > capacity > > in no time with the frame tweaks. with adding an AP that should solve > the > > problem for at least a year. > > > > 2 cents > > > > -Sean > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Muehleisen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I had the same question. I'm considering changing an AP from 2.5ms to > >> 5ms. I'm aware of the doubled latency, but I'm more interested in the > >> additional 7mb/s downlink (according to 450 capacity planner). > >> > >> We have an AP with ~50 subs and it reaches 100% downlink every > >> evening. I'm considering changing downlink from 75% to 85% and moving > >> to 5ms frames. By doing so, we should increase capacity by 9 to 11mb/s > >> on the downlink. > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Sedov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hey folks. > >> > > >> > Has anyone experimented with 5ms frame on pmp450 or the 450i? Last > >> > couple of > >> > times I tried it, it seemed like overall throughput on the AP was > >> > slightly > >> > worse than on 2.5ms, even though radio to radio link tests were > higher. > >> > > >> > > >> > peace > >> > > >> > Vlad > > > > >
