Another argument for 30° sectors.
Real tight; higher gain; better F/B ratio.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 1/25/2016 11:42 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
All of the above. This particular tower has 12 AP's installed. It's
physically overloaded and shares spectrum with two other towers in the
area.
We have several 1x and 2x subs on each AP that need to be
improved/removed. According to the capacity planner this may be our
best bet in providing some breathing room.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
is adding an AP physically tough (tower space, winter time etc.) or
logically tough (not enough spectrum)?
just curious
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Sean, I think you're correct. Adding an additional AP will be tough in
this particular situation. Just trying to squeeze as much as we can
our of this AP.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
If it was me, I'd just deploy another AP instead of trying to tweak the
frame for just a little bit more speed. you'll end up back at 100%
capacity
in no time with the frame tweaks. with adding an AP that should solve
the
problem for at least a year.
2 cents
-Sean
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I had the same question. I'm considering changing an AP from 2.5ms to
5ms. I'm aware of the doubled latency, but I'm more interested in the
additional 7mb/s downlink (according to 450 capacity planner).
We have an AP with ~50 subs and it reaches 100% downlink every
evening. I'm considering changing downlink from 75% to 85% and moving
to 5ms frames. By doing so, we should increase capacity by 9 to 11mb/s
on the downlink.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com> wrote:
Hey folks.
Has anyone experimented with 5ms frame on pmp450 or the 450i? Last
couple of
times I tried it, it seemed like overall throughput on the AP was
slightly
worse than on 2.5ms, even though radio to radio link tests were
higher.
peace
Vlad
