I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz
out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority.
Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like
is the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it
could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest.
On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on?
Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it
should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving
throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on
your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two
different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels
simultaneously.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote:
> This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD
> for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php
--
