My point is that the technology is one thing, cost is another. We could all do pmp450 with 30* sectors and fulfil a lot of demand, but no one wants to pay for it.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 19, 2016 8:59 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: > this technology has advataged to hdx as well. as the radio wont be time > shifting between tx and rx cycles, i could dedicate it time resources 100% > to downlink > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> So would pmp450 and yet you're buying epmp. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Apr 19, 2016 8:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in downstream if >>> downstream is no longer being shared with upstream and potentially reduce >>> some buffer issues. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size >>> >>> I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz >>> out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority. >>> Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like >>> is the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it >>> could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares... >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on? >>>> >>>> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds" < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it >>>>> should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving >>>>> throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on >>>>> your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two >>>>> different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels >>>>> simultaneously. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote: >>>>> > This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD >>>>> > for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>>>> >> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >
