... And then the same chipset gets used to make a "Mimosa B11v2" in a few years. On Apr 19, 2016 8:11 AM, "David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do agree about the increased capacity on the newer tech and lower > latency but lets keep in mind its still WIFI which has a great place for > end user access. > > > On 04/19/2016 08:07 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > There are advantages to ePMP other than cost. Upgrade path from UBNT or > Mikrotik or Ligo. More throughput (though that's diminishing with recent > products). Up until the 450d, ability to have decent gain in a single unit. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:04:48 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size > > My point is that the technology is one thing, cost is another. We could > all do pmp450 with 30* sectors and fulfil a lot of demand, but no one wants > to pay for it. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Apr 19, 2016 8:59 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> this technology has advataged to hdx as well. as the radio wont be time >> shifting between tx and rx cycles, i could dedicate it time resources 100% >> to downlink >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So would pmp450 and yet you're buying epmp. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Apr 19, 2016 8:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in downstream if >>>> downstream is no longer being shared with upstream and potentially reduce >>>> some buffer issues. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size >>>> >>>> I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz >>>> out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority. >>>> Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like >>>> is the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it >>>> could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares... >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on? >>>>> >>>>> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds" < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it >>>>>> should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving >>>>>> throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on >>>>>> your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two >>>>>> different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels >>>>>> simultaneously. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote: >>>>>> > This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD >>>>>> > for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>>>>> >> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >> > >
