So would pmp450 and yet you're buying epmp. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 19, 2016 8:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
> FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in downstream if downstream > is no longer being shared with upstream and potentially reduce some buffer > issues. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size > > I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz > out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority. > Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like is > the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it > could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest. > > > > On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on? >> >> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it >>> should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving >>> throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on >>> your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two >>> different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels >>> simultaneously. >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote: >>> > This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD >>> > for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>> >> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php >>> >>> > > -- > >
