this technology has advataged to hdx as well. as the radio wont be time shifting between tx and rx cycles, i could dedicate it time resources 100% to downlink
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > So would pmp450 and yet you're buying epmp. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Apr 19, 2016 8:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in downstream if downstream >> is no longer being shared with upstream and potentially reduce some buffer >> issues. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size >> >> I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz >> out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority. >> Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like is >> the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it >> could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest. >> >> >> >> On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares... >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on? >>> >>> Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it >>>> should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving >>>> throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on >>>> your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two >>>> different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels >>>> simultaneously. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote: >>>> > This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD >>>> > for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >>>> >> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> >>
