I do agree about the increased capacity on the newer tech and lower
latency but lets keep in mind its still WIFI which has a great place for
end user access.
On 04/19/2016 08:07 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
There are advantages to ePMP other than cost. Upgrade path from UBNT
or Mikrotik or Ligo. More throughput (though that's diminishing with
recent products). Up until the 450d, ability to have decent gain in a
single unit.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:04:48 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size
My point is that the technology is one thing, cost is another. We
could all do pmp450 with 30* sectors and fulfil a lot of demand, but
no one wants to pay for it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 19, 2016 8:59 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
this technology has advataged to hdx as well. as the radio wont
be time shifting between tx and rx cycles, i could dedicate it
time resources 100% to downlink
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
So would pmp450 and yet you're buying epmp.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 19, 2016 8:48 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in
downstream if downstream is no longer being shared with
upstream and potentially reduce some buffer issues.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than
half the size
I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will
sell the shiz out of it but what ya got the same ol same
for the majority.
Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing
I dont like is the play on word speed. The nutrition label
sound like it
could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture
is honest.
On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your
speed. Who cares...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on?
Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh
Reynolds" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's not going to have any effect on your frequency
re-use, but it
should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency,
improving
throughput across the board. Also, it could double your
throughput on
your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and
RXing on two
different channels - now you can TX and RX on both
channels
simultaneously.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote:
> This seems great and all but how useful is it if your
trying to do TDD
> for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php
--
