FDX will lower latency, allow for an increase in downstream if downstream is no longer being shared with upstream and potentially reduce some buffer issues.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Milholen" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:30:46 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WiFi capacity doubled at less than half the size I agree with Luthman on this one.. The play on words will sell the shiz out of it but what ya got the same ol same for the majority. Some may take advantage of the up stream but the one thing I dont like is the play on word speed. The nutrition label sound like it could have some tread in the industry if the manufacture is honest. On 4/18/2016 4:23 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Sounds like it just adds FDX which "doubles" your speed. Who cares... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Gino Villarini < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> similar to what Kumu Networks have been working on? Sent from Outlook Mobile On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM -0700, "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> It's not going to have any effect on your frequency re-use, but it should be able to drastically reduce your PTMP latency, improving throughput across the board. Also, it could double your throughput on your current RF licenses - before you were TXing and RXing on two different channels - now you can TX and RX on both channels simultaneously. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Matt wrote: > This seems great and all but how useful is it if your trying to do TDD > for frequency reuse? Such as ABAB or AAAA? > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-04/cuso-wcd041316.php </blockquote> </blockquote> --
