Getting the space in TelX and then getting multiple cross connects into Equinix 
for connects that are unavailable anywhere outside of CH1, CH2 or CH4 at a 
retail of now $1,150/month/each isn't an effective use of anything other than 
DRT\Equinix shares. Need a couple of those and now you're beholden to Equinix, 
well, if cabinets were available, which they usually aren't. 





I don't know how many other ways I can break this down without repeating 
myself, so I'll resort to that. 

It was joked that 1G ports are expensive. 
I joked that 1G ports get real expensive when attached to an Equinix $350/month 
cross connect. 
Someone said don't use Equinix. 
I said in markets like Chicago, you only really have one choice to go to and 
that's Equinix. 
Then someone pointed out, which I think most of us in this space (carrier 
hotels, big boy networks, etc.) already know that Equinix doesn't own 350 E. 
Cermak. 
Enter the $800/month riser fee. 
Enter a bunch of back and forth about a bunch of other ancillary stuff, again, 
from people that should all know better. 






----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 7:56:05 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 


Having a cabinet in Telx and Equinix covers probably 99% of providers and major 
IX connectivity. So where is the problem? 














Erich Kaiser 
North Central Tower 
[email protected] 
Office: 630-621-4804 
Cell: 630-777-9291 



On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 




If you want to have Equinix IX connectivity as well as connectivity to the 
variety of carriers present, that means you have to be in Equinix's CH1, CH2 or 
CH4. Those datacenters are routinely out of power, so you can't just buy a 
cabinet whenever you feel like it. They're only available when someone else has 
canceled theirs. Given the riser charge, you can't just take a cabinet in TelX, 
Steadfast, CME or any of the others due to the $800 riser fee. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Erich Kaiser" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 9:19:53 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 











Whats the problem with the riser(xtended x-connect) charge if they give you a 
set of strands? If you are trying to bring circuits over to DRT for lower 
x-connect, there are economies of scale like anything, but long term it makes 
sense. That's if you can not negotiate with Equinix. We will be in dual DCs in 
a few POPs by the end of they year for this reason. 













Erich Kaiser 
The Fusion Network 
[email protected] 
Office: 630-621-4804 
Cell: 630-777-9291 




On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>


Two different things and at one point three different companies. 

The Equinix rep said to get lower per XC price, you'd need 500 XCs. I know that 
isn't true because we got lower pricing. 

TelX manages the MMR and the riser, while DRT owns the building. Yes, I know 
DRT bought TelX. That riser charge was $800. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Paul Stewart" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 4:35:42 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 



Have never paid riser fees in any location ever FYI, although 111 8 th in NYC 
you are paying for it per say between floors but it’s not broken out (at least 
for me)… and it’s definitely a lot less than 500 XC’s – it’s related to MRC 
derived from power/space/XC’s combined with negotiation skills and the market 
too. 

Paul 




From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: June 19, 2016 11:55 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 


Right. One rep told us we'd need to be around 500 XCs to get a lower rate 
(which I know isn't true). Even our TelX rep said that the difference in space 
pricing wasn't enough to make up for the riser fee. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Erich Kaiser" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 10:50:46 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 

Equinix will negotiate if you have enough business with them and also having an 
alternate option to go to (Telx/DR runs the building MMR @ 350 Cermak). This 
DC/Bldg Mgmt war will go on forever. You do what fits right for the time. 











Hence why we are doing what we are doing, it helps everyone save in the long 
run. Can't stress this enough......... Every major POP we go into we 
automatically take a port or two to the local exchange and if has the major 
peers (google,netflix, etc..) So all you IXPs we want major peers!! :) 













Erich Kaiser 
North Central Tower 
[email protected] 
Office: 630-621-4804 
Cell: 630-777-9291 







On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>



Of course. Leaving Equinix is even worse as you have a $350/month cross connect 
and then an $800/month riser fee. 

That's why I specified Equinix at 350 E. Cermak. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Eric Kuhnke" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 12:47:03 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 

You know that Equinix doesn't own or run 350 E. Cermak, right? They're just one 
tenant. It's owned by Digital Realty Trust. 



On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>



In some markets, that's the only viable place to go. Chicago, for instance. 
Equinix at 350 E. Cermak has a commanding lead over anywhere else for 
connectivity. With AMS-IX, Megaport and United-IX here now, we'll likely see 
some of that shift around a bit, but it'll take time. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Eric Kuhnke" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 11:02:51 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 

Smart people don't start leases in Equinix facilities unless they have 
absolutely, positively no other option. 



On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 


<blockquote>



In an Equinix facility, 1G ports are very expensive... at $350/month per cross 
connect. :-) 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 10:10:58 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seen this Brocade before? 





Once upon a time, that was probably said about 10G links. Before then, about 1G 
links. Those 1G ports are expensive you know. 



On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Paul Stewart < [email protected] > wrote: 
<blockquote>


Had a demo of that platform a month or so ago .. wasn’t public obviously - 
pretty impressive but a lot jammed into a “small package” … tough sell for 
folks who need that kind of density, personal opinion is to keep things more 
“spread out” on 100G links reducing areas of risk, but I digress as that’s more 
design/resiliency related :) 





<blockquote>


On Jun 16, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: 



Don't worry, no one has. First public pictures. 

https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/910364895755630 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







</blockquote>







</blockquote>



</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>



</blockquote>


Reply via email to