I have it and have used it on some Hotel gateways we have and it seemed
to have saved the day which brought up the question if I should have
something on my edges to help.
On 06/21/2016 08:01 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote:
maybe BUTCH EVANS QOS SCRIPT can help you
2016-06-21 14:23 GMT+02:00 David Milholen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
I am going to do the cheaper route first before throwing a load of
money at procera.
Ok, disclosure is not an issue. I just did not understand what I
could do and could not do as far as limitation goes.
Now its time to get to work and see what I can do to make things
more smooth.
Thanks much everyone
Dave
On 6/20/2016 10:49 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I actually got comments from customers saying the network was
running smoother once I put rules in the Procera to limit
streaming, updates, etc. Biggest benefit is they can't max the
connection out with any 1 service which allows them to do huge
Apple updates while still watching Netflix.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Faisal Imtiaz
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
"the whole limit per customer thing because of title 2 stuff."
Please try to gain a better and clear understanding of the
Regulatory Rules and Requirements...
They don't say, you cannot do it... They say you have to
disclose up front what you do, and you have to do it across
the board.... i.e. you cannot discriminate between streaming
from one provider vs another content provider...or for one
customer and not for another... it is perfectly ok to
regulate, limit, police/policy video streaming, you just need
to disclose it....
:)
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <tel:305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <tel:%28305%29663-5518> Option 2 or
Email: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"David Milholen" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Monday, June 20, 2016 10:44:45 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] traffic priorities
Ive been on the fence about doing the whole limit per
customer thing because of title 2 stuff.
But from what I understand you just cant charge the
content provider for a faster pipe into your network. I
could have it wrong but I have to do what I need to
smooth out the traffic.
On 6/20/2016 5:13 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Didn't you just get a Procera in?
Limit amount of total streaming media per customer IP
to whatever you feel is necessary. It actually helps
the overall experience of the customer as video won't
max out their entire connection. Do the same with
software updates like Apple, Microsoft, Xbox, etc.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:07 PM, David
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ok, ALL of the BORG
I need some insight on what I should do.
Currently a majority of our network is
routed,static and ospf.
We keep a good lock down on our edge routers for
bad stuff but
I am looking to prioritize traffic based on three
groups.
Voice,Video and Data.
So my question is how should I prioritize Video?
A. Limit per customer account
B Limit per Customer Device
C. No Limit free for all.
Each customer has a QOS limitation set by our
radios with available burst.
Most of these QOS limitations have no issue with
most streaming customers but we have the
occasional larger family the blows the top off
the larger QOS package we have.
It got me to thinking about traffic priority levels.
Currently we cannot support a 4k stream unless we
give them a PTP link or have an Access point all
to themselves.
We make it clear that we do not support streams
over 20Mbs.
What is the best approach for such a mess LOL
Thanks
Dave
--
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
--
--
