That have an integrated 3.65 unit Timothy. It's only uncapped at this point, but it exists. C036045C014A.
Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > On Sep 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Timothy Steele <timothy.pct...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have gotten 5db better with the 450d also inner feed designed dishes seems > to work much better when under a tower also much more simple to mount on a > tower I hope they do the same with 2.4 and 365 soon > > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 12:57 PM SmarterBroadband <li...@smarterbroadband.com> >> wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini >> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 9:53 AM >> To: Animal Farm >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450d >> >> >> >> We love it! We have standardized on it >> >> >> >> -looks way better that a SM+dish, more professional >> >> -gain the same or 1-2db better >> >> -easier to assemble / align >> >> -less windload >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >> I see several WISPs deploying the 450d, but I suspect it's because they >> don't like reflector dishes, or because of the 40M license key. >> >> Cambium has indicated the 450d has a little more antenna gain than the >> regular 450 SM plus a reflector dish, but the spec sheets say 25 dBi either >> way. What are people really seeing in the field? Is there a performance >> difference in an apples-to-apples comparison? How much? I'm not going to >> get too excited about 1 dB. >> >> Otherwise, we're looking at the connectorized 450 SM. Or the connectorized >> 450i SM, which is pretty pricey.
