So over reflectors. Love to see lower priced versions of these and the reflector crap phased right out.
On Sep 16, 2016 2:13 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]> wrote: That have an integrated 3.65 unit Timothy. It's only uncapped at this point, but it exists. C036045C014A. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell [email protected] On Sep 16, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Timothy Steele <[email protected]> wrote: I have gotten 5db better with the 450d also inner feed designed dishes seems to work much better when under a tower also much more simple to mount on a tower I hope they do the same with 2.4 and 365 soon On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 12:57 PM SmarterBroadband <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini > *Sent:* Friday, September 16, 2016 9:53 AM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450d > > > > We love it! We have standardized on it > > > > -looks way better that a SM+dish, more professional > > -gain the same or 1-2db better > > -easier to assemble / align > > -less windload > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see several WISPs deploying the 450d, but I suspect it's because they > don't like reflector dishes, or because of the 40M license key. > > Cambium has indicated the 450d has a little more antenna gain than the > regular 450 SM plus a reflector dish, but the spec sheets say 25 dBi either > way. What are people really seeing in the field? Is there a performance > difference in an apples-to-apples comparison? How much? I'm not going to > get too excited about 1 dB. > > Otherwise, we're looking at the connectorized 450 SM. Or the > connectorized 450i SM, which is pretty pricey. >
