Illinois has open spaces?  I thought it was all concrete jungles
...

On Sep 29, 2016 12:18 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just to make clear where I’m coming from, we are out in the country and
> have people killed fairly regularly at RR crossings without gates or
> signals.  Roads cross RR tracks at an angle, and I hate the limited
> visibility out of a cargo van and anything that further restricts the
> visibility, I have even considered getting glass in the passenger side
> sliding door because that’s a blind spot at some of these RR crossings.
> Luckily the sand trains are slow.  The Amtrak trains though will kill you.
> I have 2 customers with family members who experienced death by Amtrak.
> They do typically put gates at crossings *after* someone is killed.  For
> example 18th Rd. by Leland, and 23rd Rd. by Somonauk, and that’s just one
> 5 mile stretch of track.  Personally, I want to see both ways even if there
> is a gate.
>
>
>
> There’s also the constant risk of backing over someone’s mailbox, I guess
> a backup camera would take care of that.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2016 1:00 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cargo van partition/bulkhead question
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 12:55 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> I can give a first hand example from my EMS days of where they would have
> saved a person. A "woman" was driving a cargo van and got in a wreck, the
> front end crumpled, drivers door was seized, items from the back speared
> through the drivers seat.on her right side. fuel ignited under the vehicle.
> The accident was 8 miles out from our ambulance garage, getting through
> town and to the scene was probably all told 10-12 minutes
>
> bystanders stopped to help, she was begging and pleading for them to get
> her out. Theycould not open the drivers door, but were able to get the
> passenger door opened. the fire engulfed the engine compartment. we were
> advised of the consious alert patient and the fire via radio so we put the
> hammer down.
>
> By the time we arrived, we assisted the bystanders with their burns, they
> drove themselves to the hospital.
>
> We then waited on scene for the coroner, and assisted with the body
> removal. Just fyi, toss a hot dog in a campfire and let it burn, thats what
> a fresh burn corpse smells like.
>
> One of the bystanders to this day still isnt right in the head having had
> to back out of a burning vehicle and listen helplessly to a person burn
> alive.
>
>
>
> The short of the story is who really gives a shit what the law is. cargo
> vehicles need them, especially utility
>
>
>
> Its inconvenient as hell to have to harness up and hook lanyard all the
> way up a tower. Ive never seen somebody fall off a tower..... see what im
> saying?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:21 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> He's a witch, burn him.
>
> On 9/29/2016 12:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Say 4.4 lbs.  (2 kG)   88 fps (26.83 m/s)
>
>
>
> 1/2 M V^2  so 1 * 26.83 * 26.83 =  718 joules
>
>
>
> 9mm pistol bullet muzzle energy is 519 joules
>
>
>
> That felt good to get my math on this morning...
>
>
>
> *From:* George Skorup
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 29, 2016 10:57 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cargo van partition/bulkhead question
>
>
>
> F=ma? I have no doubt a big ass drill bit going 60MPH could penetrate
> someone's skull.
>
> On 9/29/2016 11:52 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Put the drill at 88fps and 35lbs. Cloth seat.
>
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 11:44 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can't put more into it than it has to begin with. If the truck is going 88
> fps, and runs into an impenetrable barrier (brick wall would be close), and
> "instantly" stopped. The drill bit "might" continue at that 88 fps. It
> can't go faster than that.
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 9/29/2016 9:39 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> Add in the G force of near instantaneous deceleration...
>
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 11:30 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That sounds like an urban myth. It would take near-ballistic speeds (~~
> 600-1000 fps) to drive a drill bit like that.
>
> Driving a truck into a brick wall at 60 MPH, would only get you ~~ 88 fps.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 9/29/2016 8:35 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> I didn't see it personally, but I'm told a guy here crashed an F-150 and
> the drill with 18" bit on it flew forward from the back of the cab and the
> drill bit poked right through the front seat.  Missed him by inches.
>
>
>
> I imagine the seat slowed it down enough that it wouldn't have killed him,
> but still...
>
>
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Sent: 9/28/2016 7:11:46 PM
>
> Subject: [AFMUG] cargo van partition/bulkhead question
>
>
>
> Is there any legal or insurance requirement to have one of these?  I hate
> them, and while I understand they are to prevent decapitation by a flying
> object from the cargo area, I can’t recall ever having such a flying object.
>
>
>
> I like having a rear window on the van for visibility, and even with a
> backup camera and sideview mirrors, being able to see out the back is nice.
>
>
>
> Are there other advantages to them?  I guess the AC and heater might work
> better if isolated from the cargo space.  I’ve seen claims it makes the
> cabin quieter, but anytime I’ve driven a van with a partition, there has
> been an annoying rattle from the door to the back.  I could maybe see if
> you could put some shelving units up against the back of the partition.
> That might even make a van with dual sliding side doors viable.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>

Reply via email to