It was not my impression that frequency coordinators and competitors were "the only ones complaining", quite the opposite.
Where have you seen frequency coordinators complaining? They might have a bit of a valid point if people are coming for coordination without a path analysis, but I have yet to hear a single disparaging word from a frequency coordinator. Maybe one told you something in private? As far as a lack of US based vendors, I have Trango and Exalt links in my network, both US companies. Ceragon may be Israeli, but most of their sales and support in the US is through Cambium. Granted, SIAE is Italian and SAF is Latvian and there are some Chinese vendors. But it's not like Ubiquiti is the only US based company in the market. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 11:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] Who will have AF-11X First? The point is bad behavior is bad behavior. Lack of enforcement is a valid concern and a separate topic. Using artificially high Prices as a barrier of entry in a Tech field, ends up to be a very bad thing (for many reasons). I am happy to see USA based companies taking the lead in re-defining the licensed radio industry, it is hard not to notice that bulk of the Licensed Radio mfg are not USA based companies. It is easy to throw out sound bytes, but it takes a bit more depth in thinking and evaluation of such statements in a more 'big picture' global perspective. Besides, it is a far cry to compare 3.65 where the gear cost less than $300 vs $3000-$4500 licensed link. Yes AF11x is cheap, but a complete link is still north of $3k. So far in the context of Licensed Radios, the only ones I have seen complaining about this change are two groups of folks.. The Coordinators (because they have to do more work) and the vendor / distributors of the Other Radios (cause there is perception of making less money) The Big Picture Facts are, as a WISP, for our next Gen platforms, we need to be delivering 100/200/300/500 meg of BW, so that we can stay in business, or face the possibility of becoming irrelevant. To delivery such, we need more tools in the tool bag, yes not every tool is perfect, each has it's advantage and short comings. Use the tool for it's strength, and use something different to overcome it's weaknesses. I for one am all for encouraging more and more Mfg to compete in the delivery of next gen products, be innovative, think out side the box, offer us more tools, and feel free to re-define the status quo ! Encouragement, is what we should be doing, pooh poohing them would be foolish... BTW, I still remember such conversations about the UBNT M5 products when they started to become available, there was a lot of pooh phooing from the Motorola Canopy Camp.... well in hind-sight it is easy to say that Motorola Canopy was a better product, but UBNT expanded the size of the Fixed Wireless Market Place.. I have been in the Computer/Tech industry for a very long time... The one thing I have learned and observed time and time again is that... Any Company who has the Passion for expanding the size of the Market Place will beat out any other company who does not have such passion, even if they have the better product. Microsoft is a very classic example of such, So is UBNT, and Apple in the Smart Phone Business. :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 11:21:38 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] Who will have AF-11X First? > On 11/20/16 6:37 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: >> >> Trying to make the argument that cheaper radios = breaking the law , >> while anecdotaly possible, would be FUD. >> > > It is a fact in NN where I'm located, but NN lacked enforcement. They > popped up everywhere without being registered. Fortunately NN is going > away and they only ruined about 25HMz. > > >> Let's talk about the current license links, and how the current >> owners of licenses break the law but not being bothered to cancel >> their license once they take the link down... > > I have dealt with that and had to show the blocking path was no longer > in service, which required some research and evidence gathering, but > not a showstopper. Different from someone who pulls a frequency and > never builds it. > > ~Seth
