Enforcement issue it is... Trying to make the argument that cheaper radios = breaking the law , while anecdotaly possible, would be FUD.
Let's talk about the current license links, and how the current owners of licenses break the law but not being bothered to cancel their license once they take the link down... (The point is bad behavior is bad behavior, irrespective of being done by cheap ticket holders or by the ones who have box seats ). :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 1:20:40 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] Who will have AF-11X First? > On 11/19/16 9:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: >> So Seth, >> If I may apply the same logic (I am not condoning it ) >> >> Are you also the one who drives his car at the posted speed limit and shakes >> your head and blames the Car Mfg for making cars that can go above the speed >> limit, every time you see someone breaking the speed limit ? > > > I'm not sure I understand how that follows. > > I'm saying that crap being run by people without an NN license or > without registering locations has killed part of the 3.65 band in some > areas. Here it's unregistered UBNT M365 noisy crickets everywhere. I > would hate to see the same thing happen to Part 101. The difference is > possible actual enforcement, at least. > > Daniel said elsewhere: "The cheaper the radios – the more likely it is > people will install them without the proper licenses " > > ~Seth
