That's correct. The PTP450 does support sync, but not over power. It's the timing port or the highway.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 11/21/2016 4:06 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
If I remember right, PTP450 does support sync, just not sync over power (so you have to use the timing port), but AF-3x does have a pretty significant speed advantage, since they can use 40mhz channels and the PTP450 is limited to 20mhz (if I'm remembering right).

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Good point, I forgot the 3.65 band allows up to 1W/MHz EIRP, so
    maybe the conducted xmt power is higher than the 2 and 5 GHz variants.

    Oh, and I was looking at AF3x vs PTP450 3.65 connectorized today,
    and was surprised to see that Cambium was actually cheaper.  Not
    quite apples-to-apples since if I remember right PTP450 doesn’t
    support GPS sync?  And AFx includes the GPS antenna.

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners
    *Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 4:17 PM


    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?

    It may be amplifiers are the reason for the 3.65SM heatsink and a
    contributor to the higher pricing. There's a variety of COTS
    high-power 2ghz and 5ghz 256-QAM-capable amplifier ICs that I've
    seen inside various WISP products, it could be there is nothing
    easily available for 3.65 so that is a cause of the additional
    hardware/cooling and partially cost.

    On Nov 21, 2016 6:48 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I guess calculation is different for 3.65. They sell much less
        and in 5GHz there are more competitors.

        I dont believe UBNT/Cambium does something LTE Based. This
        SIM-Stuff and complicated infrastructure would hinder low
        cost. Wasn't there any licensing the vendor has to pay for
        patents? UBNT want to target their airmax price range.


        > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
        > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
        > Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 12:37
        > An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
        >
        > Take a look at AF-3x pricing vs AF-5x, parts cost is
        probably the same but
        > Ubiquiti prices it at double.  Also, I wouldn't expect any
        vendor to rush a new
        > 3.65 product to market unless it is fully CBRS compatible
        and probably LTE
        > based.
        >
        > Best we could probably hope for is Cambium does some kind of
        HW refresh
> based on the new wideband SM and brings the price down. It's not obvious to
        > me why the 3.65 SM is different from the 5 GHz SM, with the
        heatsink fins and
        > different LEDs, like it is based on the 450i design or
        something.  It's not like you
        > are going to run 40 MHz channels in 3.65.  There's something
        going on that's
        > not apparent to the casual observer.
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
        > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:59 AM
        > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
        >
        > I think there is 0,1% possibility this will happen.
        > As I understand the parameters of both systems are quite
        different. It would
        > need a lot of work to make them GPS-Compatible. Think you
        are Pera and have
        > the choice of bringing this to market 2017 or make
        compatibility and bring this
        > to market 2018. Guess what ...
        >
        >
        > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
        > > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Josh Reynolds
        > > Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 09:13
        > > An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
        > >
        > > "I just hope that Ubiquiti can copy the exact timing
        parameters from
        > > the Cambium products"
        > >
        > > Good luck with that.
        > >
        > > I understand it could be a good way to transition, don't
        get me wrong,
        > > I just don't (A) think they really care, for whatever
        reason and (B)
        > > built their own system from the ground up with what they
        wanted to
        > maximize performance.
        > >
        > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
        > > <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > > > I just hope that Ubiquiti can copy the exact timing
        parameters from
        > > > the Cambium products so we can mix and match
        Cambium/UBNT PtMP in
        > > the
        > > > same frequency band in the network. Im getting so much
        450 gear up
        > > > that it just has to be synced because its so dense, I
        wont' be able
        > > > to coordinate throwing some other brand of AP in their
        and having to
        > > > watch frequency usage even closer.
        > > >
        > > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Jon Langeler
        > > > <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > > > wrote:
        > > >>
        > > >> Yeah can't wait
        > > >>
        > > >> Jon Langeler
        > > >> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
        > > >>
        > > >>
        > > >> On Nov 20, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
        > > >> <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > > >> wrote:
        > > >>
        > > >> No I'm not good with paying that price for it but what
        else are we
        > > >> supposed to do? That's still the cheapeast 3.65ghz
        solution out right now.
        > > >> Now its going to get real interesting if Airfiber PtMP
        comes out
        > > >> with some 3.65ghz gear....
        > > >>
        > > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Ken Hohhof
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > > wrote:
        > > >>>
        > > >>> Depends on what you mean by "good".
        > > >>>
        > > >>> Actually we buy the 20M SM at around $315 and for special
        > > >>> occasions the uncapped integral panel at around $500
        including the
        > > >>> tilt bracket, so worse than your $275.
        > > >>>
        > > >>> They are certainly more expensive than we'd like, but
        you do what
        > > >>> you gotta do.  We do have a lot of 3.65 Lite APs so we
        save a
        > > >>> little at that end.
        > > >>>
        > > >>> If you go through a lot of them, I'd work with your
        reseller to
        > > >>> negotiate a volume discount from Cambium.  Like commit
        to 200 SMs
        > > >>> over the next year, see if they'll give you a better
        price, and
        > > >>> then take deliveries 50 at a time.  It won't be 50%
        off, but
        > > >>> you'll probably get something.  On the other hand, if
        you're like
        > > >>> me and most of your volume is 5 GHz, then just open
        your wallet,
        > > >>> unless you want to do LTE.
        > > >>>
        > > >>>
        > > >>>
        > > >>> -----Original Message-----
        > > >>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jon Langeler
        > > >>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 9:25 PM
        > > >>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > > >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
        > > >>>
        > > >>> Is everyone good with paying $275 for cambium 10Mbps
        SMs ? Or has
        > > >>> everyone just jumped ship?
        > > >>>
        > > >>> Jon Langeler
        > > >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
        > > >>>
        > > >>>
        > > >>>
        > > >>
        > > >
        >
        >
        >
        >





Reply via email to