If I remember right, PTP450 does support sync, just not sync over
power (so you have to use the timing port), but AF-3x does have a
pretty significant speed advantage, since they can use 40mhz
channels and the PTP450 is limited to 20mhz (if I'm remembering right).
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Good point, I forgot the 3.65 band allows up to 1W/MHz EIRP, so
maybe the conducted xmt power is higher than the 2 and 5 GHz
variants.
Oh, and I was looking at AF3x vs PTP450 3.65 connectorized
today, and was surprised to see that Cambium was actually
cheaper. Not quite apples-to-apples since if I remember right
PTP450 doesn’t support GPS sync? And AFx includes the GPS antenna.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners
*Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 4:17 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
It may be amplifiers are the reason for the 3.65SM heatsink and
a contributor to the higher pricing. There's a variety of COTS
high-power 2ghz and 5ghz 256-QAM-capable amplifier ICs that I've
seen inside various WISP products, it could be there is nothing
easily available for 3.65 so that is a cause of the additional
hardware/cooling and partially cost.
On Nov 21, 2016 6:48 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I guess calculation is different for 3.65. They sell much
less and in 5GHz there are more competitors.
I dont believe UBNT/Cambium does something LTE Based. This
SIM-Stuff and complicated infrastructure would hinder low
cost. Wasn't there any licensing the vendor has to pay for
patents? UBNT want to target their airmax price range.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 12:37
> An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
>
> Take a look at AF-3x pricing vs AF-5x, parts cost is
probably the same but
> Ubiquiti prices it at double. Also, I wouldn't expect any
vendor to rush a new
> 3.65 product to market unless it is fully CBRS compatible
and probably LTE
> based.
>
> Best we could probably hope for is Cambium does some kind
of HW refresh
> based on the new wideband SM and brings the price down.
It's not obvious to
> me why the 3.65 SM is different from the 5 GHz SM, with
the heatsink fins and
> different LEDs, like it is based on the 450i design or
something. It's not like you
> are going to run 40 MHz channels in 3.65. There's
something going on that's
> not apparent to the casual observer.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 2:59 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
>
> I think there is 0,1% possibility this will happen.
> As I understand the parameters of both systems are quite
different. It would
> need a lot of work to make them GPS-Compatible. Think you
are Pera and have
> the choice of bringing this to market 2017 or make
compatibility and bring this
> to market 2018. Guess what ...
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] Im Auftrag von Josh Reynolds
> > Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2016 09:13
> > An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
> >
> > "I just hope that Ubiquiti can copy the exact timing
parameters from
> > the Cambium products"
> >
> > Good luck with that.
> >
> > I understand it could be a good way to transition, don't
get me wrong,
> > I just don't (A) think they really care, for whatever
reason and (B)
> > built their own system from the ground up with what they
wanted to
> maximize performance.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
> > <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > I just hope that Ubiquiti can copy the exact timing
parameters from
> > > the Cambium products so we can mix and match
Cambium/UBNT PtMP in
> > the
> > > same frequency band in the network. Im getting so much
450 gear up
> > > that it just has to be synced because its so dense, I
wont' be able
> > > to coordinate throwing some other brand of AP in their
and having to
> > > watch frequency usage even closer.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Jon Langeler
> > > <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Yeah can't wait
> > >>
> > >> Jon Langeler
> > >> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 20, 2016, at 11:09 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
> > >> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> No I'm not good with paying that price for it but
what else are we
> > >> supposed to do? That's still the cheapeast 3.65ghz
solution out right now.
> > >> Now its going to get real interesting if Airfiber
PtMP comes out
> > >> with some 3.65ghz gear....
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Ken Hohhof
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Depends on what you mean by "good".
> > >>>
> > >>> Actually we buy the 20M SM at around $315 and for
special
> > >>> occasions the uncapped integral panel at around $500
including the
> > >>> tilt bracket, so worse than your $275.
> > >>>
> > >>> They are certainly more expensive than we'd like,
but you do what
> > >>> you gotta do. We do have a lot of 3.65 Lite APs so
we save a
> > >>> little at that end.
> > >>>
> > >>> If you go through a lot of them, I'd work with your
reseller to
> > >>> negotiate a volume discount from Cambium. Like
commit to 200 SMs
> > >>> over the next year, see if they'll give you a better
price, and
> > >>> then take deliveries 50 at a time. It won't be 50%
off, but
> > >>> you'll probably get something. On the other hand,
if you're like
> > >>> me and most of your volume is 5 GHz, then just open
your wallet,
> > >>> unless you want to do LTE.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jon Langeler
> > >>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2016 9:25 PM
> > >>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >>> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium PMP450 3.65 pricing?
> > >>>
> > >>> Is everyone good with paying $275 for cambium 10Mbps
SMs ? Or has
> > >>> everyone just jumped ship?
> > >>>
> > >>> Jon Langeler
> > >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
>
>
>
>