Remember that even a couple of sms runing at 2x or 4x will kill your peak performance if they are the ones that are usually streaming. We are very careful on what aps we put low signals on and we control what plans we offer as well based on signal strength. I just can not have a 2x customer want a 10mb plan. I do think that a 450i will definitely help with uplink interference like others have said. But i think your best bet is to drop the cash and put some 450m up on that tower. Sounds like that is a cash cow tower like my main tower is.
________________________________ From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:18:22 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 vs 450i Put a Mikrotik behind an SM and speed test to the internet Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Brian Sullivan <installe...@foxvalley.net> wrote: > > I would check out page 9-51 in the PMP 450x Configuration and User Guide > 15.0.2 > >> On 1/19/2017 11:37 AM, Tushar Patel wrote: >> So how can we tell when we are really saturating the connection? >
