+1 for slapping
On 1/20/2017 11:52 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
In a perfect world.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Kurt Fankhauser
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
You shouldn't be putting any clients on a 450AP with less than 4x
connections, when they start pulling a lot of traffic they
significantly choke the AP. Whoever engineered those links needs
slapped. I know it probably looked like a good idea at the time
to add a new customer but a couple low signal clients really
affect total AP capacity. You could probably pull all the 1x and
2x clients and replace them with 10 times more customers running
at 8x mnodulatio n and maintain the same utilization rates on that AP.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Craig Schmaderer
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Remember that even a couple of sms runing at 2x or 4x will
kill your peak performance if they are the ones that are
usually streaming. We are very careful on what aps we put low
signals on and we control what plans we offer as well based on
signal strength. I just can not have a 2x customer want a 10mb
plan. I do think that a 450i will definitely help with uplink
interference like others have said. But i think your best bet
is to drop the cash and put some 450m up on that tower.
Sounds like that is a cash cow tower like my main tower is.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Af <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Jon Langeler
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:18:22 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 vs 450i
Put a Mikrotik behind an SM and speed test to the internet
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Brian Sullivan
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
>
> I would check out page 9-51 in the PMP 450x Configuration
and User Guide 15.0.2
>
>> On 1/19/2017 11:37 AM, Tushar Patel wrote:
>> So how can we tell when we are really saturating the
connection?
>
