It's not a problem because they also sell cisco branded optics. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Huawei's only allows Cisco-branded optics. They couldn't figure out how to > edit that part of the code out. > > Joking, joking, jeez.... > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"George Skorup" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:49:21 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON > > I assume ZTE doesn't care about SFP branding? > > On 3/21/2017 7:05 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote: > > It's not open standard. They key their optics like calix. > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:11 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Seriously though... Alphion obviously doesn't have the level of software >> toys/tools that Calix does obviously, but when the cost is like 1/8th, you >> can spend that money on contractors and OLTs and ONTs and get way more subs >> installed much faster - and it's something that is still based on open >> standards. >> >> That's a hard business proposition to ignore. >> >> On Mar 6, 2017 6:59 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> haha… yeah fair enough ;) >> >> On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It can be different when you're the one paying for it :) >> >> On Mar 6, 2017 5:13 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Interesting …. do they work ok? >> >> I came from Calix and Adtran world for GPON/ONT stuff … considerably more >> than that. I did look at some DWDM stuff from China and it was total junk >> in my opinion - some people like it .. not my thing. >> >> On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm importing direct from China. 16Port OLT with Class Optics and Power >> Supply for $3200. ONT's for $25. PLC's from $2-10 depending on the >> split. Check Alibaba. >> >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yup. My plan is to start 32:1 and knock it down to 16:1 and throw in >> another OLT if needed. >> >> On 3/6/2017 12:01 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >> Google did 32x1. Common at the time of their initial deployment was 64x1. >> The company I just got off the ground did 16x1. >> >> On Mar 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> AE gets to be a headache with power costs and heat control in cabinets. >> >> >> Low oversub GPON is plenty good for now and probably well into the future. >> >> >> I believe that is what Google did, maybe 8:1 max split? >> >> >> The temptation with GPON is to stretch it to the limits, which might >> cause some re-splicing down the road if you want super high FDX. >> >> >> AE doesn’t have that problem even with equipment a decade old I can still >> supply the same SFP+ switch with 180Gbps each if I want to carry that much >> on the backhaul. Equipment is super cheap, and it’s essentially backwards >> compatible with GPON if your neighborhood runs are short like mine. But >> again, lots of power is required. >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 5, 2017 8:08 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> Calix has NG PON2 which does 10 Gbps per wavelength and multiple >> wavelengths all overlaid on GPON so nothing in the OSP has to change. All >> the splitters etc still work. That will give everyone on the PON 312.5 >> Mbps symmetrical all at the same time. So oversubscribing 3:1 you could >> sell 1G symmetrical to everyone and probably not run out of headroom. >> >> >> *From:* Carlos Alcantar >> >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 05, 2017 3:35 AM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> to add to this post with the new PON technologies being released this >> year giving everyone 1G FDX is going to be a non issue. >> >> >> >> Carlos Alcantar >> >> Race Communications / Race Team Member >> >> 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 >> >> Phone: +1 415 376 3314 <%28415%29%20376-3314> / [email protected] / >> http://www.race.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of George Skorup < >> [email protected]> >> *Sent:* Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:44:29 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> I'm not really worried about POTS and RF. Everyone is using cell phones >> and watching Netflix. >> >> The AE deployment is a total waste of equipment and resources for the >> utilization we're seeing. I have to go there next week and turn up another >> switch. The 1Gbps feed is averaging less than 100Mbps every night. The >> network owner was convinced that everyone had to have 1G FDX. They just >> don't realize how much electronics and power is required for 1k ports. >> There's less than 100 customers so far, so please, for the love of god, >> lets fix this now! We'll see what happens. >> >> Anyway.. this project we're looking to do on our own is a neighborhood of >> rich bitches. We already have PMP450 there and it works fine. They "want >> more speed" and if they're willing to put up some cash for it, then we'll >> build it. >> >> On 3/4/2017 9:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >> Alphion does, yes. >> >> >> On Mar 4, 2017 9:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What kind of costs are you talking? >> Does it talk to ONTs? ONTs with POTS ports? >> >> Sterling is AE, I know his costs are pretty low. >> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup Sent: Saturday, March 04, >> 2017 8:39 PM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] >> Small-scale GPON >> >> We're looking to do another "fiberhood" with GPON instead of AE this time >> around. I remember Chuck Hogg mentioned Alphion. Has anyone deployed the >> AOLT-4200? Looks like a good solution. Or what else have you used for small >> deployments? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- > Regards, > Chuck > > > > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
