ZTE's WAN and LAN cards have SFPs.
Parker ReedZTE USA

      From: George Skorup <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON
   
  I assume ZTE doesn't care about SFP branding?
 
 On 3/21/2017 7:05 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
  
  It's not open standard.  They key their optics like calix.  
  On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:11 AM Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
  
 Seriously though... Alphion obviously doesn't have the level of software 
toys/tools that Calix does obviously, but when the cost is like 1/8th, you can 
spend that money on contractors and OLTs and ONTs and get way more subs 
installed much faster - and it's something that is still based on open 
standards. 
  That's a hard business proposition to ignore.  
   On Mar 6, 2017 6:59 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote:
     
 haha… yeah fair enough ;)   
     
    
 On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: 
 
    
     
    
  It can be different when you're the one paying for it :)  
    
     
    
   On Mar 6, 2017 5:13 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote:
    
    
     
    
    
 Interesting …. do they work ok? 
  I came from Calix and Adtran world for GPON/ONT stuff … considerably more  
than that.  I did look at some DWDM stuff from China and it was total junk in 
my opinion - some  people like it .. not my thing. 
   
    
    
     
    
    
    
 On Mar 6, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Chuck Hogg <[email protected]> wrote: 
 
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
  I'm importing direct from China.  16Port OLT with Class Optics and Power 
Supply for $3200.  ONT's for $25.  PLC's from $2-10 depending on the split.  
Check Alibaba.  
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
  
  Regards,
 Chuck  
   
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
   On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
    
  Yup. My plan is to start 32:1 and knock  it down to 16:1 and throw in another 
OLT if needed.
 
 On 3/6/2017 12:01 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
   
 Google did 32x1. Common at the time of their initial deployment was  64x1. The 
company I just got off the ground did 16x1.  
 On Mar 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> wrote:
  
   AE gets to be a headache with power costs and heat control in cabinets.  
  Low oversub GPON is plenty good for now and probably well into the future.  
  I believe that is what Google did, maybe 8:1 max split?  
  The temptation with GPON is to stretch it to the limits, which might cause 
some re-splicing  down the road if you want super high FDX.  
  AE doesn’t have that problem even with equipment a decade old I can still 
supply the same SFP+  switch with 180Gbps each if I want to carry that much on 
the backhaul.  Equipment is super cheap, and it’s essentially backwards  
compatible with GPON if your neighborhood runs are short like mine. But  again, 
lots of power is required.  
     From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
 Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 8:08 AM
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON    
     Calix has NG PON2 which does 10 Gbps per wavelength and multiple  
wavelengths all overlaid on GPON so nothing in the OSP has to  change.  All the 
splitters etc still work.  That will give everyone on the PON 312.5 Mbps 
symmetrical  all at the same time.  Sooversubscribing 3:1 you could sell 1G 
symmetrical to everyone and probably not run out of headroom.        
     From: Carlos Alcantar    Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 3:35 AM    To: 
[email protected]     Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON      
       to add to this post with the new PON technologies being released  this 
year giving everyone 1G FDX is going to be a non issue.    
   
  Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member  1325 Howard Ave. 
#604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / [email protected] / 
http://www.race.com  
         From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of George Skorup 
<[email protected]>
 Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:44:29 PM
 To: [email protected]
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON    
     I'm not really worried about POTS and RF. Everyone is using cell  phones 
and watching Netflix.
 
 The AE deployment is a total waste of equipment and resources  for the 
utilization we're seeing. I have to go there next week and turn up another 
switch. The 1Gbps feed is averaging less than 100Mbps  every night. The network 
owner was convinced that everyone had  to have 1G FDX. They just don't realize 
how much electronics and power is required for 1k ports. There's less than 100 
customers so  far, so please, for the love of god, lets fix this now! We'll see 
what happens.
 
 Anyway.. this project we're looking to do on our own is a neighborhood  of 
rich bitches. We already have PMP450 there and it works  fine. They "want more 
speed" and if they're willing to put up some cash  for it, then we'll build it. 
 On 3/4/2017 9:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:  
   Alphion does, yes.    
    On Mar 4, 2017 9:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> wrote: 
 What kind of costs are you talking?
 Does  it talk to ONTs?  ONTs with POTS ports?
 
 Sterling is AE, I know his costs are pretty low.  
 -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup Sent: Saturday,  March 04, 2017 
8:39 PM To: [email protected] ;  [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON 
  We're looking to do another "fiberhood" with GPON instead of AE  this time 
around. I remember Chuck Hogg mentioned Alphion. Has  anyone deployed the 
AOLT-4200? Looks like a good solution. Or what else  have you used for small 
deployments?  
    
      
  
        
   
 
  
    
    
    
    
   
   -- 
  Regards,
 Chuck 
 
 

   

Reply via email to