+Graham's number.

They're about as dependable and un-biased as Fox "News".

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You believe Breitbart?!?!?
>
> What planet you live on?
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 3/30/2017 7:12 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/08/julian-assange-
> says-google-directly-engaged-clinton-campaign/
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:50 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge
>
>
>
> Wha?
>
> citation?
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From: "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
>
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>
> Sent: 3/30/2017 9:47:45 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge
>
>
>
> One other thing that I’m sure the Republicans considered when supporting
> this bill.  They know Google has been supplying and manipulating data and
> search engines for the Democrats for years.  Hell, they started a company
> specifically to do just that.  I think the Republicans are looking at
> having access to that data as being important.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:10 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge
>
>
>
> It’s true, and it is the core business case of many other social network
> companies, but people can choose not to use google.. How do they choose not
> to use the only ISP in their market?
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <(510)%20868-1614>
> Mobile: 510-207-0000 <(510)%20207-0000>
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:02 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge
>
>
>
> I heard a comment today that I had not thought about.  Apparently Google
> has been selling this data for years. The ISPs wanted to have the same
> rights.  Of course, prohibiting Google from selling this information never
> crossed their minds.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:30 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge
>
>
>
> While the FCC’s proposed “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband
> and Other Telecommunication Services” rule might not have been perfect, and
> potentially difficult to implement for small ISPs and WISPS, I think the
> basic concept was sound. I created a simple non-legally binding pledge that
> small ISPs and WISPS can sign up that I feel will demonstrate one of the
> clear differentiators between us and larger ISPs who seek to commodify
> every aspect of their customer’s usage.
>
>
>
> Check it out at http://privacypledge.us/
>
>
>
> I’m open to comments or revisions, as my goal is not to own this, but to
> try to get some visibility for our industry and its unique respect for the
> end user.
>
>
>
>
> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <(510)%20868-1614>
> Mobile: 510-207-0000 <(510)%20207-0000>
> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to