Yea, I believe WickieLeaks but nice try. It’s amazing that you care more about the source of the writing than the evidence the brought forth. This information, although sparse, is accurate. I’m sure that you don’t believe Google employees were working in the administration and had nothing to do with the Net Neutrality Act or the 20 pages redacted from that act that nobody saw.
Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge +Graham's number. They're about as dependable and un-biased as Fox "News". On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: You believe Breitbart?!?!? What planet you live on? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/30/2017 7:12 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/08/julian-assange-says-google-directly-engaged-clinton-campaign/ From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:50 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge Wha? citation? ------ Original Message ------ From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 3/30/2017 9:47:45 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge One other thing that I’m sure the Republicans considered when supporting this bill. They know Google has been supplying and manipulating data and search engines for the Democrats for years. Hell, they started a company specifically to do just that. I think the Republicans are looking at having access to that data as being important. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:10 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge It’s true, and it is the core business case of many other social network companies, but people can choose not to use google.. How do they choose not to use the only ISP in their market? Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com<http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100<tel:(510)%20868-1614> Mobile: 510-207-0000<tel:(510)%20207-0000> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:02 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge I heard a comment today that I had not thought about. Apparently Google has been selling this data for years. The ISPs wanted to have the same rights. Of course, prohibiting Google from selling this information never crossed their minds. Rory From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:30 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge While the FCC’s proposed “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunication Services” rule might not have been perfect, and potentially difficult to implement for small ISPs and WISPS, I think the basic concept was sound. I created a simple non-legally binding pledge that small ISPs and WISPS can sign up that I feel will demonstrate one of the clear differentiators between us and larger ISPs who seek to commodify every aspect of their customer’s usage. Check it out at http://privacypledge.us/ I’m open to comments or revisions, as my goal is not to own this, but to try to get some visibility for our industry and its unique respect for the end user. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com<http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100<tel:(510)%20868-1614> Mobile: 510-207-0000<tel:(510)%20207-0000> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
