WikiLeaks releases only what they feel will help their agenda, which also happens to be Putin's agenda. I don't watch Rachel Maddow, so I can't speak to anything she does. The New York Times has significantly more journalistic integrity than Brietbart.
On Friday, March 31, 2017, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > So Wikieleaks hasn’t published any fake data ever, but because Brietbart > writes about it, that means it’s fake data. But if the New York Times or > Rachel Maddow said the same thing, you would accept that as truth. And you > don’t see a problem with that? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason > McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2017 12:40 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > It's not evidence if it is made up or slanted to serve an agenda. > > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','r...@triadwireless.net');>> wrote: > > Yea, I believe WickieLeaks but nice try. It’s amazing that you care more > about the source of the writing than the evidence the brought forth. This > information, although sparse, is accurate. I’m sure that you don’t believe > Google employees were working in the administration and had nothing to do > with the Net Neutrality Act or the 20 pages redacted from that act that > nobody saw. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason > McKemie > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 9:17 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > +Graham's number. > > > > They're about as dependable and un-biased as Fox "News". > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','part15...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > You believe Breitbart?!?!? > > What planet you live on? > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 3/30/2017 7:12 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > > http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/08/julian-assange- > says-google-directly-engaged-clinton-campaign/ > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Adam > Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 6:50 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > Wha? > > citation? > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','r...@triadwireless.net');>> > > To: "af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>" < > af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>> > > Sent: 3/30/2017 9:47:45 PM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > One other thing that I’m sure the Republicans considered when supporting > this bill. They know Google has been supplying and manipulating data and > search engines for the Democrats for years. Hell, they started a company > specifically to do just that. I think the Republicans are looking at > having access to that data as being important. > > > > Rory > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Peter > Kranz > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:10 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > It’s true, and it is the core business case of many other social network > companies, but people can choose not to use google.. How do they choose not > to use the only ISP in their market? > > > > > *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <(510)%20868-1614> > Mobile: 510-207-0000 <(510)%20207-0000> > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pkr...@unwiredltd.com');> > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Rory > Conaway > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:02 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > I heard a comment today that I had not thought about. Apparently Google > has been selling this data for years. The ISPs wanted to have the same > rights. Of course, prohibiting Google from selling this information never > crossed their minds. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Peter > Kranz > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 3:30 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* [AFMUG] ISP Privacy Pledge > > > > While the FCC’s proposed “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband > and Other Telecommunication Services” rule might not have been perfect, and > potentially difficult to implement for small ISPs and WISPS, I think the > basic concept was sound. I created a simple non-legally binding pledge that > small ISPs and WISPS can sign up that I feel will demonstrate one of the > clear differentiators between us and larger ISPs who seek to commodify > every aspect of their customer’s usage. > > > > Check it out at http://privacypledge.us/ > > > > I’m open to comments or revisions, as my goal is not to own this, but to > try to get some visibility for our industry and its unique respect for the > end user. > > > > > *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <(510)%20868-1614> > Mobile: 510-207-0000 <(510)%20207-0000> > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pkr...@unwiredltd.com');> > > > > > > > > >
