Agreed.

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think blocking VPNs or SSL would be reasonable network management.
> I don't think outright blocking any legal content would be considered
> reasonable.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Sean Heskett" <[email protected]>
> *To: *[email protected]
> *Sent: *Friday, June 23, 2017 7:20:13 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ready for the Xbox one X and 100GB games?
>
> I completely agree with you on all those points josh.  It's a stupid thing
> to do for many reasons, but being illegal is not one of those reasons.
>
> I'm not picking a fight, just trying to clear the air about the legalities
> in regards to DPI rules to block or throttle a traffic type (such as
> VPN/SSL).  a lot of folks don't understand that "reasonable network
> management" is protected by the FCC NN rules.
>
> -sean
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Listen, at the end of the day you're consider penalizing the very people
>> who make it possible for you to operate, when in reality you should be
>> trying to find ways to get the government to stop handing out cruise ships
>> full of money to companies to continue doing the same old shit.
>>
>> People do not want UBB.  Cable COs have been doing it for years to help
>> stifle competition (online streaming) away from their money maker (cable tv
>> + ad revenue).
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> edit: s/can/can't/
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because you can discriminate based on traffic type except in the case
>>>> of reasonable network management.  Not to mention you will block every
>>>> single telework user in the process, along with many other types of content
>>>> riding on that tunnel.
>>>>
>>>> I'll say this, I would not be the one to want to try an explain "I
>>>> block VPNs" to the FCC.  You can have fun with that all you want.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All of that is very true Eric and I completely agree with you.
>>>>> However, Josh said it was illegal and I was pointing out that it is
>>>>> expressly legal to do per the FCC NN rules.  It's not smart or efficient 
>>>>> at
>>>>> fixing the problem but it is legal to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> you go right ahead and do DPI / deprioritize all TLS type traffic,
>>>>>> that is something I would highly encourage any of my competitors to do...
>>>>>> Since a huge % of web traffic is https now, netflix is https/tls1.2,
>>>>>> youtube is https/tls1.2, etc, all you would accomplish is hurting
>>>>>> everyone's throughput for all of the most common websites and 
>>>>>> applications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> how is it illegal?  FCC says we can manage our networks as needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Josh Reynolds <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And illegal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 2017 11:22 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We go from bad idea to worse?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Kurt Fankhauser" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:15:11 AM
>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ready for the Xbox one X and 100GB games?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you block/throttle a VPN connection with DPI? Make it so that
>>>>>>>>> if the customer turns it on the VPN their connection gets worse than 
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> it off?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On that point, we tell them that it is not our responsibility to
>>>>>>>>>> track their specific usage.  We tell them that their are routers 
>>>>>>>>>> like the
>>>>>>>>>> Fortigate which can track usage, but that we do not support those 
>>>>>>>>>> devices.
>>>>>>>>>> I tell them that I think the new Torch router does it too, but that 
>>>>>>>>>> we have
>>>>>>>>>> no experience with these devices.  "The only way that we track which
>>>>>>>>>> websites are visited and what you are doing on the Internet is with a
>>>>>>>>>> warrant or an order from the Department of Justice".  We stand 
>>>>>>>>>> behind our
>>>>>>>>>> usage tracking, and if they do not want to pay the bill then they 
>>>>>>>>>> can find
>>>>>>>>>> another provider.  We have lost two or three customers over four 
>>>>>>>>>> years who
>>>>>>>>>> refuse to pay, and it usually isn't worth sending those ones to
>>>>>>>>>> collections.  We just go and collect our equipment and write it off 
>>>>>>>>>> as bad
>>>>>>>>>> debt.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Adam Moffett <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That's an interesting point.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]; "Wireless Administrator" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 6/21/2017 3:18:07 PM
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ready for the Xbox one X and 100GB games?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We fade out our usage based plans. *Every* single customer who
>>>>>>>>>>>> had to pay surplus makes us a lot of work. Calls from each single 
>>>>>>>>>>>> family
>>>>>>>>>>>> member, what IP is this. Why cant you tell me what x.y.z.w is. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> dont use
>>>>>>>>>>>> Akamai ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to take care there is no angry escalating dispute for
>>>>>>>>>>>> a view Euros. I am sure this service times cost us more money than 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> customers had to pay surplus. We have to do flat pricing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:59:41 +0000
>>>>>>>>>>>>  "Wireless Administrator" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This industry is in trouble.  Nobody wants usage based
>>>>>>>>>>>>> billing.  Customers don’t want it for obvious reasons. ISP’s are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> afraid to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement it for fear of losing customers.  If you lose money on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an account
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is it really an asset to your business? I feel that the Large 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ISP’s have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> already implemented Usage Based Rate Adjustment. They seem to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> automated process to adjust rates that will force off the heavy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users.  Our
>>>>>>>>>>>>> industry will not get respect until it asks for it.  UBB or UBRA 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (New term
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I coined) is the way ….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 2:07 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: Simon Westlake
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ready for the Xbox one X and 100GB games?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But metered billing makes them think about what they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing.  Does the baby need to be falling asleep watching a 4K 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> movie?  The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> best way I can put it is renting an apartment with utilities 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> included.  If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm renting an apartment in FL with electric included, my AC is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> set at 68 24/7.  The cat will be very comfortable all day, why 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> care.  However, if I'm paying for electric, the cat will have to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deal with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 78 during the day and I may have to deal with 72 when I get home.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bandwidth prices are dropping for some, but for others it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> still expensive.  Not to mention the HW costs to upgrade your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> network to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> handle the higher bandwidth internally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4K tvs cost more to buy than 1080  or 720 TV's.  Why should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone who is willing to stream at 720 or pay for satellite TV, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be forced
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to pay the same as that guy that wants to watch in 4K.  Why 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should a single
>>>>>>>>>>>>> person who just needs dependable fast internet occasionally be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> force to pay
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same amount as the family with 6 kids and 30 devices?  Why 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kid willing to buy his game on a disc be forced to pay the same 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the guy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who doesn't want to get up off the couch to change a disc?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is it we are the only industry that is expected to deliver
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a top notch fast and reliable service at a single low price.  The 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric
>>>>>>>>>>>>> company gets to charge per KW, the all you can eat buffet charges 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> per
>>>>>>>>>>>>> person, the cell phone company charges per device, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cable/satellite charges
>>>>>>>>>>>>> per box, hell even the streaming companies get to put limits on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of people that can stream per account.  Why is it when we ask a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> heavy user
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to pay their fair share all hell breaks lose and we are the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> greedy bastards?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark                            <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Myakka Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.MyakkaTech.com> www.MyakkaTech.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proud Sponsor of the Myakka City Relay For Life
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please Donate at Please Donate at <http://www.myakkatech.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RFL.html> http://www.myakkatech.com/RFL.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wednesday, June 21, 2017, 1:11:27 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem with metered billing is that it doesn't solve the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. The customer still purchased a game they want to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download, or they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a 4K TV they want to watch movies on. Most people are just 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> look for other options if they have to pay every time they try to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> use a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> device in their household, and even if people are willing to pay, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you still
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have to be able to deliver enough service to them to give them 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the speeds
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until there is more spectrum available, I think DPI is a much
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better solution.. you can deprioritize and shape things like game
>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloads, and prioritize/shape their video streaming. I wish 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better option, but I really don't think implementing UBB is a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this problem. It may give you more money to build up your network 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it is poison to most customer's ears, and it won't change 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> behavior that much unless it's extremely painful for them 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> financially.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/21/2017 10:51 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> metered billing.. wave of the future
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Adam Moffett < <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I read some scary stuff the other day along a similar vein.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically if you're selling 25mbps then you'll need a 4:1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> oversubscription ratio to support peak hours hi def streaming 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaint.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As adoption of 4K video increases, that ratio will approach
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1:1.  You'll have to either start supplying 100meg, or start 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> billing for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consumption....or jack the price way up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They were looking only at streaming video trends, and didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even consider stuff like this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Jeremy" < <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 6/21/2017 1:03:09 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ready for the Xbox one X and 100GB games?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, this sucks for us.  Even worse, many of these games come
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out with dual licenses so that you can play on Windows 10 or XB1 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> same purchase.  I bought a couple games and checked it out.  It 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was amazing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be able to just continue my Halo Wars right where I left off 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptop, but it was double the download size.  This makes Forza 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> potentially
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 200GB, without DLC.  When you are providing customers 300-500GB 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> per month
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without overages it makes heavy Xbox customers very quickly switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> providers.  I'm not sure if that is a blessing or a curse.  For 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, it has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not been a gigantic churn issue for us, but the future of 4K 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> content will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely hit us all pretty hard.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My main issue with this is that purchasing a disc is not an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> option.  I initially bought discs, only to find that even after 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ripping
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the hard drive, I have to walk down to the network closet 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to insert
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the disc.  Digitally purchased games can just be loaded from a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> menu, like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of the hacked consoles.  There is no option to 'upgrade' to a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> digital
>>>>>>>>>>>>> license if you have purchased a disc.  Also, if you own multiple 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xbox One
>>>>>>>>>>>>> consoles (say at home and at work), you can play any of your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> games on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> either console, at any time, just not simultaneously.  Discs are 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> useless to me.  The only way to get this digital license is to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> download it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Internet (or hack the console...not yet an option).  
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a big bummer to heavy Xbox users when they get hit with massive 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> overages,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they usually switch to Comcast.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Eric Kuhnke < <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will be the new normal with the next generation Xbox,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> when many customers start bringing them home...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://m.hardocp.com/news/2017/06/18/forza_motorsport_7_
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will_be_100gb_download> https://m.hardocp.com/news/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017/06/18/forza_motorsport_7_will_be_100gb_download
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Simon Westlake
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Email:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sonar Software Inc
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The future of ISP billing and OSS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sonar.software> https://sonar.software
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to