Jim stated: "The 'physics' of the universe could be so extensive that even a 
p=np simulation environment might not be able to discover the hidden principles 
of science or even discover the logical discrepancies of the science of the 
day."

I'd like to wing a comment here please. Unless it could be proven that  P= NP, 
no such simulation would be reliable. This introduces the notion of the 
experiencing "us" existing within individual versions of illusion and 
holographic reality. In such a context, what would simulation be a class of?

Considering heuristics, isn't a very principle of everything (including 
science) the omnipresence of algorithms? Likewise, we may enquire: Does a 
singularity, or a paradox exist within/without an algorithm?

Pertinently, does P=NP exist as an algorithm?

"Stephen Cook showed in 1971 that any NP problem can be converted in polynomial 
time to the specific problem SAT, the Satisfiability Problem for Propositional 
Calculus clauses."
(http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/propm/papers/Cook.pdf p.1)

Since then, SAT has been proven to be both NP-Hard and NP-Complete. (Cook-Levin 
Theorum).

P is a subset of NP (Refer wiki.c2.com/?NpComplete), but algorithmically, 
boundary P, within boundary NP keeps on growing, even to a state where P and NP 
= NP-Complete.

In theory, an X-boundary point where P=NP may eventually be reached. And from 
that X-boundary point onward, what would emerge? Would we discover how quantum 
entanglement and a dual-singular boundary would co-exist in a pure, fractal 
state, as a simulation of paradox? Perhaps we would simply discover yet another 
dot of the finitely-infinite universe, but not the tapestry itself?

As such, it seems possible that if P and NP co existed within the same 
simulation, that all of the universe - as we know it- formed part of such a 
simulation. In other words, what we might be discussing would possibly only be 
an instance of a never-ending simulation.

Rob
________________________________
From: Jim Bromer via AGI <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 09 July 2018 2:00 PM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] New Paper - Temporal Singularity and the Fermi Paradox

Could a logical simulation discover hidden principles of science if
p=np ? The 'physics' of the universe could be so extensive that even a
p=np simulation environment might not be able to discover the hidden
principles of science or even discover the logical discrepancies of
the science of the day. For example, the wave-particle duality is a
great candidate for an artifact of p<>np. (If we had p=np then it is
much more likely that people could discover the solution to what seems
like a paradox.)  The problem is that the range of effects of particle
physics could be so extensive - or just so wrong - that more extensive
simulations still might not be able to find evidence to support an
explanation or an alternative elementary theory for physics. On the
other hand, following the primary motivation (if not the methods or
conclusions) of the logical positivists the p vs np dilemma certainly
looks like it might be a fundamental problem of contemporary science.
Jim Bromer


On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via
AGI <[email protected]> wrote:
> Following this conversation with interest. I think, the complexity of life,
> as we know it, cannot be explained by P alone. The stronger contention might
> be that P and NP must both be present at all times. If we could satisfy this
> contention for "simulation", then logic indicates both NP-Hard and
> NP-Complete have to exist within the context of this "Simulation".
>
> Is it relevant whether we experience reality as a simulation, or not? How
> would we even know if it was a simulation, unless we could find a window in
> the simulation to climb through and look at it from the outside? That is the
> problem of scalable deabstraction, which is also 100% resident within the
> context of reducing NP to P. Is it heuristic enough to flow through
> boundaries as if they do not exist?
>
> Rob
> ________________________________
> From: Jim Bromer via AGI <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, 09 July 2018 10:54 AM
> To: AGI
> Subject: Re: [agi] New Paper - Temporal Singularity and the Fermi Paradox
>
> Effective world knowledge is based on practical advancements and most
> practical advancements cannot be made in pure simulations (like those
> that can overtake the advancements in the real world). Something like
> a triple abstraction principle in mathematics including the
> transformational algorithms that would go with them could be gained in
> simulations, so a n=np algorithm, if one is feasible, might be found
> in a simulation like this. And it might go unnoticed by the human
> operators of the simulation.
> Jim Bromer
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Stefan Reich via AGI
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Where's the relation there?
>>
>> Maybe our simulation is run on supercomputers of NP power.
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 07:52, Shashank Yadav <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we are living in a simulation, then P equals NP, I think.
>>>
>>> -
>>> Shashank
>>>
>>>
>>> ---- On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:53:31 +0530 Mark Nuzz via AGI
>>> <[email protected]> wrote ----
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:15 PM, Matt Mahoney via AGI
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Recursive self improvement in a closed environment is not possible
>>> because
>>> intelligence depends on knowledge and computing power. These can only
>>> come
>>> from outside the simulation.
>>>
>>>
>>> I generally agree with this. But let's go into the esoteric world for a
>>> moment and consider: Suppose we ourselves are living in a simulation,
>>> then
>>> what implications does this have?
>>> Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions +
>>> participants + delivery options Permalink
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Reich
>> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems
>> Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions +
>> participants
>> + delivery options Permalink
> Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants
> + delivery options Permalink

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T81817474dba9a838-M1e9c776b9e8eec401c5ba43a
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups

Reply via email to