The term Creativity is very umbrella. It can require an observer but I think an agent might exhibit creativity to itself within its current library of states and actions. It just might execute less probable sequences in an effort to progress through regions of non-routine complexity AI'ishly.
Radical novelty though also could be exhibited with one observer, the agent itself. In that case the agent might require a capability for variance in the modeling perspective of the observed creativity. Then creativity might only be an observational thing where an observer looks at one splattering of paint and deems it creative where another random splattering is not. The core of functional creativity though could be that ability to variationally morph chains of projective operational modeling while computationally injecting outcomes predictively and potentially until a remote focus is achieved. So if the agent is usually operating within one general set of cycles and then reorients the projective foci in such a way in an attempt to match the perceived focal rhythm of a modeled group set, that's including permuting the perceived operational characteristics where computational structures are fetched from other non-or semi-related domains and infused... "fetched" or "emerged"... John > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Goertzel [mailto:[email protected]] > > Far from new and radical, the view you're presenting is very familiar to me > (and everyone else in the AGI field), we just don't agree with it > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
