Because in a competitive environment which _requires_ exponential economic growth you get all the problems we are facing today. You just ignore technological unemployment and social asymmetries that get bigger and bigger. Today only a few people benefit from robots/AI and millions suffer because this socioeconomic framework does not provide them with the necessities of life once their job is no longer required to due higher efficiency/automation. Do you suggest that all the millions of people working at McDonalds will find new jobs in AGI R&D? Why do the most intelligent people on this planet have such a hard time to think outside the box when it comes to economics?

On 01/08/2013 01:19 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
I fail to see why people get upset over the prospects of robots doing
their work for them, and the economic growth, freedom, and improved
living conditions that go along with it.

--
-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23508161-fa52c03c
Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to