very well thought, Boris. I agree with your thoughts about the Web. It strikes me as the most useful utility but horrible time suck ever invented. smart phones are even worse... I don't have one but have tinkered around with others phones to know what is at least going on! the answer is it just brings a time wasting to you around-the-clock.... socializing is usually good though, in moderation, at least in terms of expanding your network. some extreme loners like Nietzsche on the other hand could make great use of their hours alone, however the problem then is getting too out of touch with reality.
Mike Archbold (I get weird sentence structure with voice recognition) On 3/6/13, Boris Kazachenko <[email protected]> wrote: > A (not so) new conclusion on my intro (http://www.cognitivealgorithm.info): > > . I am deeply convinced that main challenge we face in formalizing GI is our > specie-wide ADHD. > Our cognitive psychology, lagging a light year behind our technology, is > addicted to mental crutches of authority, examples, & experimentation, while > theoretical integrity is neglected & abused. > > It's pretty obvious that AGI is by far the most important problem now. Yet, > not one out of 7B people pays it his full attention. A handful of people > claim to do so, but they all find excuses to fluff & tinker, at the expense > of building coherent theory. To me, it's a stark proof that a dressed-up ape > desperately needs therapy. I've experimented with various methods to focus > on my meta-theory, with subjective success. For those who like the results > (above), I posted suggestions on my other blog: > > > Cultivating focus on extreme generalizations. > > > Sustaining top-down attention is critical for anything complex, especially a > theoretical breakthrough. Such ability is scarce because we evolved to focus > on here & now survival, while far & future was back-of-the-mind luxury. > Modern society is drastically more secure, but our attention spans lag far > behind. Almost anyone can become a world-changing genius, if he spends 10 > years fully focused on important problem. at the cost of so-called "life": > unthinkable for ADHD- addled hunter-gatherers we still are. > > Attention span as discussed here is not simply a duration of focus on a > given subject. Rather, it's a relative strength of higher cortical areas, > which represent generalized experience, in selecting subjects for focused > attention. For me, selection & basic understanding of my top priority came > early & easy. But actually maintaining effective focus on important stuff in > spite of ubiquitous distractions was far more difficult. Over the years, I > majorly improved my concentration thanks to these observations: > > > Practice, externalizing thoughts, & avoiding distractions: > > > Practice forms increasingly redundant representations, differentiated by > their context to explore alternative scenarios. Such redundancy is key to > maintaining subconsciously searching threads, even when your consciousness > is distracted. It also fills up memory & starves unrelated subjects out of > resources. This is very important: irrelevant memories keep competing for > our attention until well forgotten. But we need a conducive environment to > facilitate this virtuous cycle of practicing. > > The most basic working environment is a notepad or a computer screen, so we > need to fill them with a well designed write-up of the subject matter. The > brain, quite obviously, has plenty of memory for a few pages of text, scarce > resource here is attention. Writing down thoughts simply turns them into a > sensory feedback, which attracts attention much better than internalized > abstractions. Also helps a motor feedback, such as vocalizing, writing by > hand, semi-random editing/ re-arranging text or code. > > Even more critical is concise & cohesive (thus memorable) terminology, > abbreviations, & symbols, - small enough to keep reverberating within one's > working memory. To build a coherent mental model, one should be using/ > designing a dedicated pseudo-language, with subject-specific syntax & > semantics. Just as important is a macro-structure: comprehensive write-up > with regular & contextually integral paragraphs & parts. Basically, one > should always try go for quality vs. quantity, continuously refining, > consolidating, & extending old articles or programs, rather than piling-up > new loosely related ones. > > Of course, we're social animals, & our most important "environment" is the > people we deal with. > Hence the urge to bounce our ideas & decisions off others: it forces us to > focus on the implications. Your listener's attention (if credible) > stimulates yours, even if he doesn't really contribute anything. One > solution is a socially-imposed institutional environment, as in a good > university or a company. > But that requires societal consumer competence, which is sorely lacking in > relatively generalized fields. > > Absent relevant stimulation (be honest about "relevant"), one must block the > irrelevant one, AKA life. Real-life socializing is almost always > meaningless, at least compared to impersonal reading & writing. But people > are so desperate to belong that they will settle for the least irrelevant > group they can join, even obviously detrimental to their stated purpose. > Suppressing this urge is a must for any significant progress. However > miserable social isolation feels at first, avoiding distractions is an > effective way to ultimately focus: broadly stimulated brain always does > something, so attention is a zero-sum game. Anyway, social stimulation can > be largely replaced by "pseudo-social" one: writing or talking to oneself. > > Beside socializing, the worst attention hog now is the web, & my solution is > rationing. Unless there is something urgent or work-related (unlikely), I > only connect for ~2 hours once a day. Sticking to it was a challenge, I have > to use "Freedom"(& highly recommend it) to keep myself honest. This sounds > trivial, but staying off-line made a huge difference to my concentration. > And I am not even talking about cell phones, - never considered catching > that plague. > Also helps using a specific desk, computer, & times of the day only for > work, down to locking oneself in. Such cognitive behavioral therapy is also > useful with insomnia & other self-control problems. > > But even more insidious, at least for a generalist like me, are internal > distractions: wandering thoughts. Just recently, I came up with a low-tech > solution: thought conditioning. Positive conditioning of relevant thoughts > seems impractical because the delay is too long, but the negative one is > very simple & old-fashioned: catch yourself thinking about some obvious > distractions, & slap your face hard. Eventually, these subjects become > subconsciously unpleasant, & you will stop thinking about them. Even the > habit of specifically monitoring thoughts for distractions already helps to > terminate them. > > A less direct form of thought conditioning is via neurofeedback, article. I > currently use, with moderate success, very simple feedback: every day, I > write down the number of hours spent effectively focused on work, > translating total number of hours spent into top 10% out of recent working > hours. > More advanced neurofeedback may become possible in relatively near future by > visualizing subject-associated cortical activity via transcranial imaging, > such as EEG, fMRI, or infrared spectroscopy. > > Ideally, we should be able to directly stimulate or condition cortical areas > that represent the subject we want to focus on, via transcranial direct > current, magnetic fields, ultrasound, or even implants. > Big-picture intellectual integrity should be improved by stimulating left > dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: the last to myelinate during development & > containing most general concepts, thus executive function. > > BCI-assisted control over the focus of one's attention will be the most > profound revolution yet, - it will change what we want out of life. But, > waiting for the technology might leave you hopelessly behind those who > cultivate their attention the old-fashioned way. > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
