It'll probably be safer then to create AGIs which are athiest, theist, and 
agnostic, rather than any single point of view. This can be done by exposing 
them to certain viewpoints more than others, akin to living in a community / 
family.
~PM

Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:10:29 -0800
Subject: Re: [agi] Is Religion Efficient?
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

PM,

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:




So there are multiple aspects to religious worldview as compared to materialist 
worldview;among them, 
1) causality ascription2) trust models 3) social rules

What is the implication of an AGI proclaiming that it is a believer of a 
particular religion?
IMHO it all gets down to what emerges in discussions, as a TRUE believer sees 
many things from a different POV.

 
Would people trust an AGI  that claims it believes?

... and displays in its discussions that it believes - probably YES, at least 
until it does something that is inconsistent with such a belief. As we have 
seen throughout history, almost any incredible bad deed can be justified by 
almost any religious POV, e.g. Pope Urban launching the Crusades, or Mohammad 
killing the men of Medina, and selling their wives and children into slavery.

 
Would people trust a parrot who claimsit believes?

No, because it is unable to demonstrate its belief through discussion. However, 
a signing chimpanzee should be able to demonstrate.
 

Is religious belief only the province of humans, or does it extend to animals 
andartificial beings?
I don't see anything that is particularly human.


On another thread several years ago, I pointed out that an AGI would most 
likely become a religious zealot, because religions provide entire mechanisms 
for explaining many things that lack competing explanations.


Steve

Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:39:45 -0800

Subject: Re: [agi] Is Religion Efficient?
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]


Jim and Piaget,

Religion provides a simplified model of the effects of other people believing 
that you believe that if you do bad, that God will get you. Hence, they have a 
reason to trust you that goes beyond simple cause-and-effect. Of course you can 
violate that trust, but then God DOES get you in subtle ways, as the people 
around you now distrust you while trusting others, so your efforts fare poorly.



In a generally religious setting, those who don't go along with it do poorly, 
not because of overt discrimination, but rather because you are not trusted as 
others are trusted.

The Koran is an interesting read. Mohammad was obviously an astute social 
engineer, and even provided advice to non-believers, e.g. to keep heretical 
activities locked behind your front door.



Steve
======
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:

You do not need a religion to build a simple causal model of the world. 
However, a well thought out materialistic causal model would lead to 
unanswerable complexities.  And if a causal model interferes with the creation 
of non-causal relations then the model is going to be only of limited use 
unless it was always being changed a little.




On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Piaget Modeler <[email protected]> 
wrote:





Religion may be an efficient paradigm for an AGI to use in navigating the world.
Ascribing causal events to an imperceptible deity may be an efficient mechanism 


for devising a simple and coherent model of the world, given volumes of 
somato-sensory data and its derivable conceptual implications. -- Thot of the 
day.



~PM                                       


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  





-- 
Jim Bromer




  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  




-- 
Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six hour 
workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full employment.








  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  





-- 
Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six hour 
workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full employment.







  
    
      
      AGI | Archives

 | Modify
 Your Subscription


      
    
  

                                          


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to