> I would define consciousness more simply as being able to measure
> the impact
> of your existence on those things you observe.
...
> I would say that
> consciousness is at its
> essence a purely inferred self-model, which naturally requires a fairly
> large machine to support the model.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -James Rogers


Of course, this captures part of the "consciousness" phenomenon, but it's
very much a Daniel-Dennett-esque reductionist model, which accounts ONLY for
the "cold" (structural, dynamical) aspects and not for the "hot"
(experiential) aspects....

ben

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to