The reason your argument is a mistake is that it also makes reference to
the conscious awareness of the low-level intelligence (at least, that is
what it appears to be doing). As such, you are talking about the wrong
intelligence, so your remarks are not relevant.
I didn't mean to be doing that.
Of course Searle, in the parable, has intensive consciousness, as well as
efficient and adaptive intelligence
But the knowledge of Chinese is immanent in the system {Searle+rulebook},
which does not have intensive consciousness, and in the context of knowing
Chinese, has only raw intelligence but neither efficient nor highly adaptive
intelligence...
-- Ben G
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
