On 5/20/07, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, it sounds much better than your previous descriptions to me (though there are still issues which I'd rather not discuss now).
Much of our disagreement seems just to be about what goes in the def'n of intelligence and what goes in theorems about the properties required by intelligence. Which then largely becomes a matter of taste. But how about systems that cannot learn at all but have strong
built-in capability and efficiency (within certain domains)? Will you say that they are intelligent but not too much, or not intelligent at all?
I would say that they do have intelligence. But I would conjecture that there are strict limits to how much efficient intelligence such systems can have. -- Ben ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
