From: "Kingma, D.P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Okay, with "text", I mean "natural language", in it's usual
low-bandwidth form. That should clarify my statement. Any data can be
represented with text of course, but that's not the point... The point
that I was trying to make is that natural language is too
low-bandwidth to provide sufficient data to learn a sufficient model
about entities embedded in a complex physical world, such as humans.
Ah . . . . but natural language is *NOT* necessarily low-bandwidth.
As humans experience it with pretty much just a single focus of attention
and only one set of eyes and ears that can only operate so fast -- Yes, it
is low bandwidth.
But what about an intelligence with a hundred or more foci of attention and
the ability to pull that many Wikipedia pages simultaneously at extremely
high speed?
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=98558129-0bdb63
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
