I noticed yesterday that most of the videos of talks and panels from AGI-08 
have been uploaded (http://www.agi-08.org/schedule.php).  Big thanks to the 
organizers for that!
 
I have some difficulty getting into some of the papers but the 10-ish minute 
overview talks are by and large quite good, and the panel discussions are 
particularly interesting.  I feel much better now about not going to the 
conference!  Hopefully the rest of the talks will be posted, I can't wait to 
watch them.
 
Some personal reactions to particular things:
 
* Finally, I think the field has moved beyond the need for so many papers on 
"six secrets of AI", "five reasons AI has failed", and so on.  Even the 
obligatory "What is AI?" talk was largely redundant (although Dr. Wang's point 
-- that we will all have different definitions and we should take that into 
account when studying the work of others -- needs saying).  This is good news.  
Perhaps next year's conference won't need so many overview talks.
 
* Somehow I had this vague notion that SOAR had basically dried up and blown 
away in the 1990s, but John Laird's description of current work in SOAR was 
terrific and quite exciting.  I'll be following their progress closely.
 
* There are now quite a number of architectures with AGI-type ambitions that 
have significant implementation behind them (Novamente, SOAR, LIDA, NARS, 
OSCAR, BICA, Texai, and others).  The most interesting parts of the panels for 
me was when the people involved in building those architectures discussed what 
they have in common and differences in approach for similar problems.  As Ben 
Goertzel (and Sam Adams and others) point out, these architectures share quite 
a lot at the level of their "boxes and arrows" overview slides, which provides 
some context for interesting detailed discussion.  If such discussion occurred 
on this list that would be really cool; but perhaps a workshop at AGI-09 where 
the architects of these actually-existing systems discussed their similarities 
and differences and current limitations would be worthwhile.  I'd sure pay to 
see it!
 
* It was quite interesting to see that simulation/visualization as an important 
operating principle / reasoning mechanism is becoming so popular.  Ideally, I 
suppose, such modal mechanisms would do double duty in perception and 
simulation... accomplishing that and interfacing it cleanly with other 
modalities or general-purpose knowledge representation is really fascinating 
and I have a feeling we'll be seeing more along those lines.  I wonder if 
Novamente will go sort of solipsistic and absorb AGISim into itself as a modal 
reasoning module.
 
* Along those lines, there seems to be a growing (certainly not universal) 
consensus among complete-system builders that virtual embodiment is a "best 
approach" for providing broad knowledge support (grounding) without messing 
around with robots.  Somebody could write an excellent paper about the 
potential pitfalls of such an approach (detail, fidelity, deep causality issues 
behind appearance, function, and inter-object + inter-feature relationships, 
and so on).  If nobody else is working in detail on publishing such an analysis 
perhaps I will study those issues for some months and try to write something 
for AGI-09 about it.
 
* Stephen Reed is one of the most clear and deliberate speakers I've seen in 
this field.  It's really interesting how seeing a person talk about their 
research makes it seem more real and interesting than just reading about it.
 
* I wish Josh's Variac paper wasn't just a poster... but I suppose something 
has to get left out.  Hopefully next year there will be more concrete 
implementation/experimentation progress to report in a talk.
 
* Limiting people to 10-12 minutes makes it basically impossible to present the 
contents of a paper, so the talks turn into project overviews.  Actually I 
found that to be a GOOD thing, and hope it continues that way (as long as we 
don't get the same overview talks year after year...)
 
* Some presenters were very effective and some were not.  I encourage everybody 
to rehearse their talks to make sure that the amount of material presented is 
appropriate to the time frame, and to make sure it is presented smoothly.
 
Thanks to the organizers and all the participants.  Fantastic stuff.
 

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to