Just to be clear, my comments were not at all directed at you specifically, just about the issue in general.
-Aris On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:11 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eh, I thought 8197 was taking advantage of a neat little bug. I'd also > kind of like to see how R106 is interpreted with a non-numeric adoption > index, and this might be the one opportunity (although there might be > precedent that I don't know about). > > I wasn't aware of the history, though (and I see that G. already got a > win from ribbons), so I change my vote to AGAINST. > > Jason Cobb > > On 7/1/19 10:44 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > I vote as follows: > >> > >>> ID Author(s) AI Title > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > > PRESENT > >>> 8197 G. none no power is all powerful > > AGAINST. I want to note that I consider anyone who votes FOR this > > without some sort of significant bribe, blackmail, or manipulation > > thoroughly boring. We shouldn't just hand out wins to whoever asks for > > one infinite power without making them do some work for it. It's just > > not fun. This happens all the time, and so many people have gotten > > easy wins by proposal it's just silly. > > > >>> 8198 Jason Cobb 1.0 Be gone, foul demon! > > FOR > >>> 8199 Jason Cobb 3.0 Fixing instant runoff > > FOR > >>> 8200 Aris, G. 3.0 Sane AI Defaulting > > FOR > >>> 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out > > FOR > > > > -Aris >
