Uh, doesn't distributing with an incorrect AI listed invalidate the
decision if the lack of correct essential parameter is noted?
(we just discussed that I think? Maybe I missed part of that.)
CoE: the Proposal Pool is not empty, it contains the proposal noted
below.
Also, in R107, the ancient "lack is correctly identified" text (that
predates the current CoE rules) doesn't have a public requirement.
On 7/1/2019 10:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Accepted, revision: The AI of proposal 8197 is none, but the AI of the
decision on whether to adopt that proposal is 1.0.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 9:14 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote:
On 7/1/2019 6:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
8197 G. none no power is all powerful
CoE: The AI of the Decision to Adopt Proposal 8197 is 1.0, not 'none'.
In R1607:
> Determining whether to adopt a proposal is an Agoran decision. For
> this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the adoption
> index is initially the adoption index of the proposal, or 1.0 if
> the proposal does not have one
The standing precedent is that "proposal does not have an AI" is equivalent
to "Proposal has AI=none", so the Decision AI is set to 1.0.
