Dude.  Its a newsweek article.  Its not like I just pulled it out of the air.

I assume by your response that you're pro-iPhone, which is fine.  I
asked because I figured people would have the info and would like to
share it.  Especially somebody who was, you know, pro-iPhone.  You're
not in that group of people, which is fine.  I'd ask that you not
criticize me asking questions, please ...

As for "critic-idiot", I missed your interview in Newsweek.  I'll look
for it next time.

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:48 PM, ConAim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  So, to clarify, I can write and distribute what I want for the
>  iphone?
>   I can charge nothing and do an ad based thing?  I can build in house
>  apps, and have them on the iphones?  Apple can't pull the plug on my
>  app at their discretion?
>
>  Well, which all these question, why don't you answer it to youself.
>  Let just assume that you are CEO of Apple (well just assume). Will you
>  allow any unknown distributor/developer go use your app store to
>  distribute random virus/trozan? Will Android doing the same? What is
>  the best method to control these situation?
>
>  As far as I know, there are certain rules that you need to follow, why
>  don't you go and gather some info. rather than look at some iPhone
>  crititic-idiot guys?
>  Do some more research before response, please...
>
>
>
>
>  On May 4, 2:18 pm, "Pierre N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I don't see where my response and Jonathan Zittrain statement don't
>  > jive, so clearly he is not full of it !
>  > Yes, they can refuse your app (killing it is slightly overstated, but
>  > hey we all need sensational titles don't we ?) and I said so in my
>  > reply.
>  > But saying they can refuse your app because you are competing with
>  > them is not funded. There is a clear (I have to admit that it might
>  > not be complete) list of reasons why they would refuse to distribute
>  > your app (look at the keynote, porn, spyware/malware are some of them)
>  > and competing with them is not one of them. If you see a reference to
>  > this in the Newsweek article let me know, that's something worth
>  > blogging about !
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
> > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Kevin Galligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > Yes.  Actually reading is the way to go.  I stand corrected.
>  >
>  > > I did read somewhere that they could yank your app if they felt like
>  > > it, and that you required approval from apple to distribute your app,
>  > > which I assumed would make in house apps unreasonable.
>  >
>  > > Ah!!!  I remember!!!  My opinion was formed by the "random blog entry"
>  > > of Newsweek...
>  >
>  > >http://www.newsweek.com/id/135150
>  >
>  > > "... an iPhone can only be changed by Steve Jobs or soon, with the
>  > > software development kit, by programmers that he personally approves
>  > > that go through his iPhone apps store ..."
>  >
>  > > The author being interviewed said the following, pretending to be Steve 
> Jobs ...
>  >
>  > > "OK, we're going to allow third-party apps, but you can't just hand an
>  > > app to someone, you have to put it through the iPhone store, and we
>  > > reserve the right to take a cut for every app. And if we don't like
>  > > the app, we can kill it."
>  >
>  > > So, to clarify, I can write and distribute what I want for the iphone?
>  > >  I can charge nothing and do an ad based thing?  I can build in house
>  > > apps, and have them on the iphones?  Apple can't pull the plug on my
>  > > app at their discretion?
>  >
>  > > It would seem your response and the guy being interviewed by newsweek
>  > > don't jive.  That guy is selling a book, so, you know.  Maybe he's
>  > > full of it.
>  >
>  > > Anybody else want to chime in?  Bueller?  Bueller?
>  >
>
> > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Pierre N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >> Android can stand up on his own, you don't need to try to put down the
>  > >>  iPhone to feel better about Android.
>  > >>  They will both coexist happily and the (possible) demise of one will
>  > >>  not make the other one better.
>  > >>  While I agree with what you said about Android, I feel the need to
>  > >>  correct a few wrong statements regarding your iPhone affirmations :
>  >
>
> > >>  On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Kevin Galligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > >> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > I'll respond to this.  I think the platform itself is great.  Here's 
> why.
>  >
>  > >>  > - The iphone is polished, but Apple is like a totalitarian state.  
> You
>  > >>  > can do whatever you want, as long as Steve is OK with it.  You want 
> to
>  > >>  > have an app on the iPhone?  Better hope they like it.
>  >
>  > >>  True
>  >
>  > >>  > You also better
>  > >>  > hope they don't decide to compete with you.  Yank.  Your app is out 
> of
>  > >>  > the store.
>  >
>  > >>  Don't think it's true, are you basing this statement on some real
>  > >>  event or even a random blog entry ?
>  >
>  > >>  > Also, I believe you can't just give it away.  YOu need to
>  > >>  > charge, and they take a cut.  You want to develope something open
>  > >>  > source and give it out?  Not happening (as far as I know. I could be
>  > >>  > wrong).
>  >
>  > >>  You are wrong, it's even clearly mentioned on the main iPhone SDK page 
> :
>  > >>  http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/
>  > >>  "The iPhone Developer Program provides a complete and integrated
>  > >>  process for developing, debugging, and distributing your free,
>  > >>  commercial, or in-house applications for iPhone and iPod touch."
>  >
>  > >>  > You want to write some in-house app for a business or
>  > >>  > whatever?  I don't think you can do that.
>  >
>  > >>  Wrong again
>  >
>  > >>  I totally agree with everything else you've written
>  >
>  > >>  > [...]
>  >
>
>
> > >>  > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM, ConAim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  This is a Google's fishing game; they throw out 50 pieces of 
> baits and
>  > >>  > >  got overwhelm response on the number of fishes from around the 
> world.
>  > >>  > >  I'm sure they will get some big whale and some big shark on this
>  > >>  > >  game.... lol.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  The fact is they just want to throw out some money to get their
>  > >>  > >  Android platform out there. Yes, they success on trying to get 
> some
>  > >>  > >  attention on us developers and the more developers involved the 
> more
>  > >>  > >  chance that there will be a good hardware vendors that willing to
>  > >>  > >  partnering with them. But then ask yourself this question, do you
>  > >>  > >  think this Android is worth it? Look back at their SDK and see it 
> for
>  > >>  > >  yourself:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  - poor interface UI design, common admit it, look at iPhone 
> interface
>  > >>  > >  and Android interface and do 1 to 1 compare.
>  > >>  > >  - UI designer???? Where is it???? I'm sick and tire of manually
>  > >>  > >  manipulate the xml layout.
>  > >>  > >  - so much bug, yup, some time I have to kill the adb.exe restart
>  > >>  > >  eclipse, -wipe, to be able to continue the development.
>  > >>  > >  - performing issues, yup, sometime it took more then 3+ minute 
> for the
>  > >>  > >  emulator to initiate start.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  Which all these issues, do you think they will successful in the
>  > >>  > >  mobile business? Ah… And where is the hardware? Don't tell me you 
> will
>  > >>  > >  not lost any more cash building a hardware then have touch screen,
>  > >>  > >  accelerometer, for less than $300. Dream too much ain't good for 
> you …
>  > >>  > >  
>  >
>  > >>  > >  On May 4, 9:09 am, dr123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >>  > >  > How can the application fail when there was a hit and a user
>  > >>  > >  > registration?
>  > >>  > >  > Come on.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > On 4 Μάϊος, 13:47, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > How do you know it wasn't simply the application that failed? 
> Yes,
>  > >>  > >  > > there are 4 judges, why would you doubt this if they already 
> confirmed
>  > >>  > >  > > it. Honestly, sometimes is hard not to flame on you guys.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > On May 4, 5:44 am, dr123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > Nice philology but i believe approx 1/10 apps has a client 
> server
>  > >>  > >  > > > which is able to count the hits. Calculatos don't for 
> example. Why
>  > >>  > >  > > > would someone complain? He doesn't know...
>  > >>  > >  > > > Google promised 4 judges.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > On 4 Μάϊος, 10:44, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > > aksonov,
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > > There were 1700+ entries. There are only a handful of 
> people that like
>  > >>  > >  > > > > you are complaining they didn't get a fair judging. 
> Unfortunately with
>  > >>  > >  > > > > such a large number of entries there will always be a 
> small number of
>  > >>  > >  > > > > people that will feel like they got cheated. Even if the 
> contest is as
>  > >>  > >  > > > > best as it can be. I'm guessing that the number of people 
> that feel
>  > >>  > >  > > > > they got cheated will increase after they find out they 
> lost. This
>  > >>  > >  > > > > will always be the case in any contest. I'm sorry for 
> your pain and
>  > >>  > >  > > > > hard work but I do not don't think that this contest 
> should be delayed
>  > >>  > >  > > > > just for a few people that feels they got cheated. 
> Personally I don't
>  > >>  > >  > > > > think I can handle another week of checking this forum 
> every 5
>  > >>  > >  > > > > minutes.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > > On May 4, 3:34 am, aksonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > I don't understand something - top 100 app were 
> selected (?!) but I
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > still have ONE testing for my client/server app. Do we 
> have ONE judge
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > per application?? Or applications were selected without 
> looking into
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > them?? I didn't expect that Google could organize 
> things in such
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > way... Ogh, my belief in Google as "company for people" 
> is broken.
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > If it happened not only with me, please post here.
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > I don't believe that it is OK for Google to get such 
> negative feedback
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > from many submitters, this way ADC become just lottery 
> or something
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > like this  (when just one judge could decide 
> application is good or
>  > >>  > >  > > > > > not)- Hide quoted text -
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>  >
>  > >>  > >  > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>  >
>  > - Show quoted text -
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to