Good for you!
On May 4, 6:53 pm, phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Honestly, who cares about good faith? If you consider sloppy judging a
> "minor thing", well, it's your problem, deal with it. If they can't
> deliver what they promised it's their problem. I've learned my lesson.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > If you are really looking for an answer here it is: People that whine
> > is the worst possible people you can have in a team or community. They
> > bring everybody else down. Whining or negativity is like a decease
> > that if you do not put an end to it or try to mitigate it, it will
> > spread and infest everybody around us. I do not believe in my gut that
> > google is acting in bad faith, if they were I would be the first to be
> > complaining. No, people that whine they usually do it every time they
> > can, in their jobs, in their relationship. These people also will make
> > a minor thing into a huge problem, almost like yellow journalism.
>
> > On May 4, 10:17 am, "Kevin Galligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Why do you feel like you need to?
>
> >> 2008/5/4 Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> > How do you know it wasn't simply the application that failed? Yes,
> >> > there are 4 judges, why would you doubt this if they already
> >> confirmed
> >> > it. Honestly, sometimes is hard not to flame on you guys.
>
> >> > On May 4, 5:44 am, dr123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > Nice philology but i believe approx 1/10 apps has a client server
> >> > > which is able to count the hits. Calculatos don't for example. Why
> >> > > would someone complain? He doesn't know...
> >> > > Google promised 4 judges.
>
> >> > > On 4 Μάϊος, 10:44, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > aksonov,
>
> >> > > > There were 1700+ entries. There are only a handful of people
> >> that like
> >> > > > you are complaining they didn't get a fair judging.
> >> Unfortunately with
> >> > > > such a large number of entries there will always be a small
> >> number of
> >> > > > people that will feel like they got cheated. Even if the contest
> >> is as
> >> > > > best as it can be. I'm guessing that the number of people that
> >> feel
> >> > > > they got cheated will increase after they find out they lost.
> >> This
> >> > > > will always be the case in any contest. I'm sorry for your pain
> >> and
> >> > > > hard work but I do not don't think that this contest should be
> >> delayed
> >> > > > just for a few people that feels they got cheated. Personally I
> >> don't
> >> > > > think I can handle another week of checking this forum every 5
> >> > > > minutes.
>
> >> > > > On May 4, 3:34 am, aksonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > I don't understand something - top 100 app were selected (?!)
> >> but I
> >> > > > > still have ONE testing for my client/server app. Do we have
> >> ONE judge
> >> > > > > per application?? Or applications were selected without
> >> looking into
> >> > > > > them?? I didn't expect that Google could organize things in
> >> such
> >> > > > > way... Ogh, my belief in Google as "company for people" is
> >> broken.
>
> >> > > > > If it happened not only with me, please post here.
> >> > > > > I don't believe that it is OK for Google to get such negative
> >> feedback
> >> > > > > from many submitters, this way ADC become just lottery or
> >> something
> >> > > > > like this (when just one judge could decide application is
> >> good or
> >> > > > > not)- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:http://www.opera.com/mail/- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
