Honestly, who cares about good faith? If you consider sloppy judging a "minor thing", well, it's your problem, deal with it. If they can't deliver what they promised it's their problem. I've learned my lesson.
> > If you are really looking for an answer here it is: People that whine > is the worst possible people you can have in a team or community. They > bring everybody else down. Whining or negativity is like a decease > that if you do not put an end to it or try to mitigate it, it will > spread and infest everybody around us. I do not believe in my gut that > google is acting in bad faith, if they were I would be the first to be > complaining. No, people that whine they usually do it every time they > can, in their jobs, in their relationship. These people also will make > a minor thing into a huge problem, almost like yellow journalism. > > On May 4, 10:17 am, "Kevin Galligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why do you feel like you need to? >> >> 2008/5/4 Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > How do you know it wasn't simply the application that failed? Yes, >> > there are 4 judges, why would you doubt this if they already >> confirmed >> > it. Honestly, sometimes is hard not to flame on you guys. >> >> > On May 4, 5:44 am, dr123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Nice philology but i believe approx 1/10 apps has a client server >> > > which is able to count the hits. Calculatos don't for example. Why >> > > would someone complain? He doesn't know... >> > > Google promised 4 judges. >> >> > > On 4 Μάϊος, 10:44, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > aksonov, >> >> > > > There were 1700+ entries. There are only a handful of people >> that like >> > > > you are complaining they didn't get a fair judging. >> Unfortunately with >> > > > such a large number of entries there will always be a small >> number of >> > > > people that will feel like they got cheated. Even if the contest >> is as >> > > > best as it can be. I'm guessing that the number of people that >> feel >> > > > they got cheated will increase after they find out they lost. >> This >> > > > will always be the case in any contest. I'm sorry for your pain >> and >> > > > hard work but I do not don't think that this contest should be >> delayed >> > > > just for a few people that feels they got cheated. Personally I >> don't >> > > > think I can handle another week of checking this forum every 5 >> > > > minutes. >> >> > > > On May 4, 3:34 am, aksonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > I don't understand something - top 100 app were selected (?!) >> but I >> > > > > still have ONE testing for my client/server app. Do we have >> ONE judge >> > > > > per application?? Or applications were selected without >> looking into >> > > > > them?? I didn't expect that Google could organize things in >> such >> > > > > way... Ogh, my belief in Google as "company for people" is >> broken. >> >> > > > > If it happened not only with me, please post here. >> > > > > I don't believe that it is OK for Google to get such negative >> feedback >> > > > > from many submitters, this way ADC become just lottery or >> something >> > > > > like this (when just one judge could decide application is >> good or >> > > > > not)- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
