Please watch the vulgar language - there's simply no need for it. Thanks! - n
On 8/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007.08.02, Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Should I step down as project > > leader and let someone else take over? The irony is that the title > > really doesn't mean much at all. > > I suspect that you simply don't understand what it means in the context of > a community-based open source project. > > It doesn't mean that you arbitrarily make decisions quietly and then go > implement them without discussion with the community. > > Please share with us YOUR definition! > > > So, in the spirit of open source software meritocracies: please place > > your money where your mouth is. Come up with a list of actionable > > changes you'd make if you were king. Lets hear it--and if everyone > > agrees to a particular change, we'll declare it made. (Note: declaring > > anything to a volunteer-driven organization doesn't guarantee that > > anyone will actually do it.) > > The graceful thing to do would be to say "I fucked up, sorry, there was no > malice on my end, it was a simple mistake and I take responsibility for > not communicating my ideas to the community before implementing them. > Let's move on!" > > But your use of the word "king" makes me think you don't really quite > understand the role, unless you're thinking of a king working in a > parliamentary government. > > > -- > AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ > > To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the > body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the > Subject: field of your email blank. > -- Nathan Folkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
