Hi, OOps! I must be near-sighted :-) Anyhow the tagger isn't any good at this, at least regarding the Swedish dictionary. What about the Constraint Grammar, can it be used?
Yours, Per Tunedal On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 10:06, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote: > Per Tunedal <[email protected]> čálii: > > > When doing lemmatisation the tagger isn't used, as far as I can see. > > This leaves all inherent ambiguities in the Swedish dictionary to be > > handled somehow. > > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Lemmatisation says "swe-tagger" and > "swe-disam" all over the place. > > -- > Kevin Brubeck Unhammer > > GPG: 0x766AC60C > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
