On 4 March 2016 at 07:52, Per Tunedal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, of course! That has always seemed a bit unnatural to me. It's
> harder to decide on the right source language lemma before translating
> than doing it after translation.
I almost entirely disagree, and I've got experience and data to back it
up. Target language smoothing does not help much, if your source language
analysis is good.
You can disambiguate the source language to nigh-100% if you use more
analysis levels, such as dependency and semantics. This is what we do at
GrammarSoft / VISL. It works.
Apertium could also do it this way, and it would benefit all languages
built from a specific source.
-- Tino Didriksen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
