El 2018-02-14 01:38, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió:
Thanks for your comments.
Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page.
Please let us know if you have further questions.
It seems that making the repository read-only and later deleting it is
the best option then. As Fran and Xavi said, we would go through the
wiki pages, READMEs, Virtualbox/Docker configs, etc. to replace
SourceForge links with GitHub links in the meantime.
Shardul C.
Note, this will not just be replacing links, but also commands. It's no
good
replacing a link "svn co http://"; with the github one, and then leave a
"svn commit". The documentation should be updated wholesale as a result
of the move.
This includes rewriting the contents of the Using_SVN page and
deprecating it.
Fran
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
